PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 3117837

One year's experience with programmed oocyte retrieval for IVF.

J D Rainhorn·R G Forman·J Belaisch-Allart·A Hazout·N Fries·J Testart·R Frydman
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We have previously described a simplified form of ovulation stimulation for IVF in which the day of presumed oocyte retrieval is determined several weeks in advance. This paper retrospectively analyses this technique in 296 unselected patients over a one year period to assess if the method is suitable for routine use in an IVF programme. Oocyte retrieval was performed on the predetermined day in 70% of patients commencing stimulation. In the remainder, the presumptive day of oocyte retrieval was modified, or the cycle was cancelled. Compared with 356 patients undergoing a comparable classically monitored IVF stimulation during the same period, there was no significant difference in the cancellation rate of cycles prior to oocyte recovery, in the numbers of oocytes or embryos obtained or in the pregnancy rate between the two populations. It is concluded that programmed oocyte retrieval does not have a deleterious effect on the success rate of IVF compared with classical clomiphene citrate/HMG stimulation and it considerably facilitates the administration of an IVF programme.

Explore related subjects

ClomipheneEmbryo TransferFemaleFertilization in VitroHumansMenotropinsMenstrual CycleOocytesOvaryOvulation DetectionPregnancyRetrospective StudiesComparative StudyJournal ArticleResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J D Rainhorn, R G Forman, J Belaisch-Allart, A Hazout, N Fries, J Testart, R Frydman. 1987. One year's experience with programmed oocyte retrieval for IVF.. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136576

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2006

Is the addition of metformin efficacious in the treatment of clomiphene citrate-resistant patients with polycystic ovary syndrome? A structured literature review.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this literature search is to establish if metformin is efficacious when given to clomiphene citrate (CC)-resistant polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) patients. DESIGN: Medline database was searched from 1 January 1980 to 1 January 2005. Inclusion criteria were prospective randomized control trials where metformin was randomized either with placebo or CC to induce ovulation in the CC-resistant patient. RESULT(S): Group 1: Four trials were prospective double-blind placebo controlled. When the data of the four trials were pooled, the overall effect of the addition of metformin in the CC patient was P=.0006 with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of odds ratio (OR) 1.81-8.84. Group 2: In two trials the randomization was only prospective. When the data of these two trials were pooled, the overall effect of the addition of metformin in the CC-resistant patient was P<.0001 with a 95% CI of OR 6.24-70.27. Groups 1 and 2: The combined data show an overall effect of P<.0001 with a 95% CI of OR 3.59-12.96. CONCLUSION(S): The addition of metformin in the CC-resistant patient is highly effective in achieving ovulation induction.

Clomiphene↗
PubMed2006

The clomiphene citrate challenge test versus the exogenous follicle-stimulating hormone ovarian reserve test as a single test for identification of low responders and hyperresponders to in vitro fertilization.

OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to compare the exogenous FSH ovarian reserve test (EFORT) versus the clomiphene citrate challenge test (CCCT), basal FSH, and basal inhibin B, with respect to their ability to predict poor and/or hyperresponders in an IVF population. DESIGN: Prospective randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Fertility center of a university hospital. PATIENT(S): One hundred ten patients undergoing their first IVF cycle, randomized into two groups. INTERVENTION(S): Fifty-six patients underwent a CCCT, and 54 patients underwent an EFORT. In all patients, the test was followed by an IVF treatment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Ovarian response, expressed by the total number of retrieved oocytes. RESULT(S): Univariate logistic regression showed that the best predictor for poor response is the CCCT (area under receiver operator characteristic curve [ROC-AUC] = 0.87), with maximal accuracy of 0.89. Multiple logistic regression analysis did not produce a better model in terms of improving the prediction of poor response. For hyper response, univariate logistic regression showed that the best predictor is the inhibin B increment in the EFORT (ROC-AUC = 0.92) but with a low maximal accuracy of 0.78. Again, multiple logistic regression analysis did not produce a better model in terms of predicting hyper response. CONCLUSION(S): Our study, the first which compares the CCCT with the EFORT for the prediction of poor and hyperresponders, shows that the CCCT is superior for identification of low responders. The EFORT (inhibin B increment) is superior for prediction of hyper response at the cost of a high rate of false positives. Neither of the two tests seems adequate to act alone for identification of both poor and hyperresponders.

Clomiphene↗