PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 3120092

Tinnitus--the initial evaluation.

Abstract

Initial evaluation of patients with tinnitus presents a challenge to the otolaryngologist's skills, knowledge, and judgment. History-taking, physical examination, and the ordering of initial laboratory tests should be orchestrated to efficiently evaluate patients with tinnitus. By the end of this initial evaluation, major decisions have to be made in regard to the employment of additional expensive and possibly invasive diagnostic tests. We present an outline to expedite the initial evaluation of patients with tinnitus as their major concern.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D E Mattox, W J Richtsmeier. 1987. Tinnitus--the initial evaluation.. https://doi.org/10.1177/019459988709600210

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects' ability to just follow conversation in competing speech, reversed speech, and noise backgrounds.

The performance on a conversation-following task by 24 hearing-impaired persons was compared with that of 24 matched controls with normal hearing in the presence of three background noises: (a) speech-spectrum random noise, (b) a male voice, and (c) the male voice played in reverse. The subjects' task was to readjust the sound level of a female voice (signal), every time the signal voice was attenuated, to the subjective level at which it was just possible to understand what was being said. To assess the benefit of lipreading, half of the material was presented audiovisually and half auditorily only. It was predicted that background speech would have a greater masking effect than reversed speech, which would in turn have a lesser masking effect than random noise. It was predicted that hearing-impaired subjects would perform more poorly than the normal-hearing controls in a background of speech. The influence of lipreading was expected to be constant across groups and conditions. The results showed that the hearing-impaired subjects were equally affected by the three background noises and that normal-hearing persons were less affected by the background speech than by noise. The performance of the normal-hearing persons was superior to that of the hearing-impaired subjects. The prediction about lipreading was confirmed. The results were explained in terms of the reduced temporal resolution by the hearing-impaired subjects.

Audiometry