PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 3711946

Evaluation of two oxygen analyzers by computerized data acquisition and processing.

Abstract

Monitoring of inspired oxygen concentration during anesthesia with nitrous oxide is becoming accepted as essential. This type of monitoring demands accurate monitors that respond rapidly. We evaluated two such devices for their response patterns to rapid changes in oxygen concentration, a galvanic or "fuel cell" unit and a polarographic device. Data were stored after analog-to-digital conversion. The response patterns to stepwise changes in nitrous oxide and oxygen mixtures were recorded at flow rates ranging from 2 to 10 L/min. Both units responded accurately to all changes in the absolute oxygen concentration; the polarographic unit was, on average, twice as fast. Responsiveness to nitrous oxide was low (less than 0.4% at 100% nitrous oxide), and the stability of the signals was good. The 90% response time (T90) was consistent for any stepwise increase or decrease in oxygen concentration between 0, 21, 33, 50, and 100%. After a step change from 0 to 100% oxygen at a gas flow rate of 10 L/min, the T90 was 5.8 seconds in the polarographic device and 11.4 seconds in the galvanic device (p less than 0.01). After a decrease from 100 to 0% oxygen, the T90 was 0.6 second longer in both monitors. Comparing flow rates of 2 L/min with 10 L/min, the T90 was delayed by 1.1 and 2.3 seconds for an increase, and by 1.4 and 2.9 seconds for a decrease in oxygen concentration. Experimental data suggest that both sensors respond adequately during routine clinical use. The faster response of the polarographic device is probably of limited clinical relevance, but it may aid in calibration.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

K Erdmann, J P Jantzen, C Etz, W F Dick. 1986. Evaluation of two oxygen analyzers by computerized data acquisition and processing.. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01637677

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Stereoselective pharmacokinetics of ketamine and norketamine after racemic ketamine or S-ketamine administration during isoflurane anaesthesia in Shetland ponies.

BACKGROUND: The arterial pharmacokinetics of ketamine and norketamine enantiomers after racemic ketamine or S-ketamine i.v. administration were evaluated in seven gelding ponies in a crossover study (2-month interval). METHODS: Anaesthesia was induced with isoflurane in oxygen via a face-mask and then maintained at each pony's individual MAC. Racemic ketamine (2.2 mg kg(-1)) or S-ketamine (1.1 mg kg(-1)) was injected in the right jugular vein. Blood samples were collected from the right carotid artery before and at 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, and 128 min after ketamine administration. Ketamine and norketamine enantiomer plasma concentrations were determined by capillary electrophoresis. Individual R-ketamine and S-ketamine concentration vs time curves were analysed by non-linear least square regression two-compartment model analysis using PCNonlin. Plasma disposition curves for R-norketamine and S-norketamine were described by estimating AUC, C(max), and T(max). Pulse rate (PR), respiratory rate (R(f)), tidal volume (V(T)), minute volume ventilation (V(E)), end-tidal partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PE'(CO(2))), and mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) were also evaluated. RESULTS: The pharmacokinetic parameters of S- and R-ketamine administered in the racemic mixture or S-ketamine administered separately did not differ significantly. Statistically significant higher AUC and C(max) were found for S-norketamine compared with R-norketamine in the racemic group. Overall, R(f), V(E), PE'(CO(2)), and MAP were significantly higher in the racemic group, whereas PR was higher in the S-ketamine group. CONCLUSIONS: Norketamine enantiomers showed different pharmacokinetic profiles after single i.v. administration of racemic ketamine in ponies anaesthetised with isoflurane in oxygen (1 MAC). Cardiopulmonary variables require further investigation.

Anesthesia, General↗