PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 4003537

Missing stapes and stapes-replacing prosthesis.

Abstract

Our study of 205 ears with missing stapes, secondary to some type of chronic ear disease, showed that only 40% of such ears are suitable for ossiculoplasty. The remaining 60% are unsuitable because of a fixed footplate, severe atelectasis, hearing better than 25 dB (these patients do not need the operation), or poor discrimination. A new stapes replacement prosthesis (SRP), which we term Tabor, is described for use where indicated. The prosthesis has two parts: The lower part (or base) is made of a broad inorganic, biocompatible material (Teflon). This part fits and covers most of the footplate, ensuring maximal stability. The upper part of the prosthesis is made of autograft or homograft bone--usually a malleus head--the contact of which with the drum prevents extrusion. In twelve out of fourteen ears insertion of this prosthesis was successful; the average postoperative air conduction went from 56 dB to 29 dB, leaving an average air-bone gap of 16 dB. The bone conduction also improved, from an average of 20 dB to 13 dB.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J Sadé, E Yaniv, S Avraham, C Fuchs, B Sacs. 1985. Missing stapes and stapes-replacing prosthesis.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/4003537/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[A hearing aid anchored in the cranial bone for amplification of bone conduction].

The purpose of this study was to compare hearing and understanding with a bone conduction hearing aid of a new type and with conventional models. The new instrument, BAHA (bone anchored hearing aid) is connected with the skull percutaneously rather than transcutaneously as with the conventional instruments. In the ENT department of Nijmegen University Hospital the understanding of speech with both types of hearing aid was evaluated thoroughly. The patients had a middle-ear loss with in addition an inner-ear loss of 60 dBHL at most. A conventional air conduction hearing aid (behind or inside the ear) was unsuitable for them because of, for instance, chronic runny ears or anomalies of the auditory meatus. A conventional bone conduction hearing aid containing a transducer pressing on the skin was rejected because of poor understanding or serious side effects such as headache and pressure pains. At the first session a titanium screw was implanted in the skull behind the ear. The percutaneous superstructure was put into place a few months later at a second session. In none of the patients were there peroperative problems or postoperative infections of any importance. Understanding of speech in silence and in noise was evaluated with the BAHA and with the conventional aid. Differences in understanding of speech were regarded as significant if they amounted to more than twice the known intra-individual standard deviation. As to understanding of speech in silence, 7 of the 15 patients were found to understand significantly better with the BAHA than with a conventional aid. In the other patients no difference was found.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Bone Conduction