PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 498921

Thrombosis after phlebography?

Abstract

In contrast to the report by Albrechtsson, we have never seen clinically manifest thrombosis in more than 20,000 phlebographies; only small, clinically insignificant thrombi in a very few cases. The reason is because we have used only 40 cm3 of a 45% contrast medium in connection with heparin precaution. However, there is the possibility that the deep venous valves are damaged. Therefore Amipaque is important for the phlebography. Our test, 20 cm3 45% conventional contrast medium injected directly into varicose veins, always gives a venous thrombosis of about 20 cm. The same amount of Amipaque has never shown a reaction.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R May. 1979. Thrombosis after phlebography?. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/498921/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Pain accompanying leg venography: a comparison of sodium and methylglucamine diatrizoates.

Leg venography with either 50% sodium diatrizoate or 60% meglumine diatrizoate was performed on 31 patients suspected of having deep venous thrombophlebitis. Four of 14 patients receiving meglumine diatrizoate experienced pain during venography, as compared to 14 of 17 patients receiving sodium diatrizoate (p less than 0.004). A second study showed no statistically significant difference in the incidence of pain between two groups of patients receiving either Renografin-45 (6% sodium diatrizoate, 39% meglumine diatrizoate) or Renografin-M-45 (45% meglumine diatrizoate).

Diatrizoate