PubMed · 6522015
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
B D Abduev, D D Gurdzhiian, Iu G Lipskiĭ, A A Postnikov. 1984. [A trauma bed on wheels].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6522015/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
CONTEXT: One of the main difficulties in adequately treating the pain of neonatal patients is the scarcity of validated pain evaluation methods for this population. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the reliability of two behavioral pain scales in neonates. TYPE OF STUDY: Cross-sectional. SETTING: University hospital neonatal intensive care unit. PARTICIPANTS: 22 preterm neonates were studied, with gestational age of 34 +/- 2 weeks, birth weight of 1804 +/- 584 g, 68% female, 30 +/- 12 hours of life, and 30% intubated. PROCEDURES: Two neonatologists (A and B) observed the patients at the bedside and on video films for 10 minutes. The Neonatal Facial Coding System and the Clinical Scoring System were scored at 1, 5, and 10 minutes. The final score was the median of the three values for each observer and scale. A and B were blinded to each other. Video assessments were made three months after bedside evaluations. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: End scores were compared between the observers using the intraclass correlation coefficient and bias analysis (paired t test and signal test). RESULTS: For the Neonatal Facial Coding System, at the bedside and on video, A and B showed a significant correlation of scores (intraclass correlation score: 0.62), without bias between them (t test and signal test: p > 0.05). For the Clinical Scoring System bedside assessment, A and B showed correlation of scores (intraclass correlation score: 0.55), but bias was also detected between them: A scored on average two points higher than B (paired t test and signal test: p < 0.05). For the Clinical Scoring System video assessment, A and B did not show correlation of scores (intraclass correlation score: 0.25), and bias was also detected between them (paired t-test and signal test: p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The results strengthen the reliability of the Neonatal Facial Coding System for bedside pain assessment in preterm neonates.
OBJECTIVE: Most methods used to estimate ICU bed needs rely either on simple formulas that do not consider the actual needs of the population or on simulations that are too specific to be applicable to all hospitals. We sought to develop a universally applicable nonparametric method. DESIGN AND SETTING: For each day, the number of immediate patient transfers to other ICUs because of a full unit and the number of patients treated in the ICU were collected. The number of beds needed was selected according to the minimization of both the mean and the variance of three parameters (accessibility, safety, and efficiency). This method was applied to the ICU of a general hospital. Robustness of the model was assessed using outliers. MAIN RESULTS: During the 5-month study period, 215 ICU stays were collected. The method selected a ten-bed model whereas length-of-stay ratio and case-mix methods selected a twelve- and height-bed models respectively. An unusual increase in admission requests had no consequence on the bed number selected, indicating that the method was robust. None of the parameters were dependent on specific ICU characteristics, establishing that this method is applicable to any type of hospital ward. CONCLUSION: Our model is reliable for determining the number of beds needed in any type of ICU and can be used by all ICU managers. The software is available.
BACKGROUND: An optimal thermal environment is desirable for preterm infants. These infants are usually nursed in incubators, but cot-nursing may provide an alternative. Measures to assist the maintenance of body temperature for smaller infants in open cots include extra clothing/bedding, warming up the nursery and heating the cot mattress. Recently a heated water-filled mattress has been developed to maintain the temperature of a cot-nursed preterm infant. While there may be benefits of nursing preterm infants in open cots, there may be potential risks such as nosocomial infection caused by more handling due to easier access. OBJECTIVES: Among preterm infants allocated to cot-nursing vs incubator care in neonatal period, to assess effects on their temperature control and weight gain. SEARCH STRATEGY: The standard search strategy of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group was used. This included searches of electronic databases: Oxford Database of Perinatal Trials; Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (Cochrane Library Issue 4 2001); MEDLINE (1966-2001); and CINAHL (1982-2001), previous reviews including cross references. SELECTION CRITERIA: All trials using random or quasi-random patient allocation in which infants receiving care in standard newborn cots were compared to infants managed in a conventional air heated incubator. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: The authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data for the primary outcomes of temperature control and weight gain. Meta-analysis was conducted using a fixed effects model. Results are presented as relative risk (RR) for categorical data and mean difference (MD) and weighted mean differences (WMD) for data measured on a continuous scale. MAIN RESULTS: Nine potential studies were identified of which four, involving 173 babies, were included in this review. When compared to incubator care, cot-nursing resulted in a statistically significantly higher mean body temperature (MD 0.30 degrees C; 95% CI 0.10, 0.50, one trial) and a decrease in proportion of infants not breast feeding at hospital discharge (RR 0.52; 95% CI 0.28, 0.94, two trials, 77 infants). No statistically significant difference was shown in weight gain, reported by two trials involving 69 infants. The comparison of cot-nursing using a heated water-filled mattress versus incubator care, which included four trials and a total of 149 infants, produced similar results. Cot-nursing with warming of the nursery resulted in statistically significantly smaller weight gain during week one compared to the incubator group in one trial that involved 49 infants (MD -5.90 g/kg/day; 95% CI -11.13, -0.67) with no significant difference found for weeks two and three. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Due to the small numbers of trials included and infants studied, and the resulting imprecision in the measures of effect for all outcomes, the review does not give a clear indication for the role of cot-nursing for preterm infants. Further assessment of the role of cot nursing for preterm infants using randomised controlled trials is necessary.