PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 6753643

Premedication with intramuscular midazolam: a prospective randomized double-blind controlled study.

Abstract

One hundred A.S.A. physical status I and II surgical patients were randomized to receive midazolam, 0.07 mg/kg (group M, 31 patients), hydroxyzine, 1.0 mg/kg (group H, 34 patients), or midazolam diluent as a placebo (group P, 35 patients). Drugs were administered in the vastus lateralis muscle 60 to 90 minutes before anesthesia induction. Anesthesia was induced with thiopental, 3.0 mg/kg, followed by 1.0-mg/kg increments if required. An entry criterion was that patients score greater than or equal to 50% on a subjective Anxiety Visual Analog Test (AVAT). Anxiety was also objectively rated on a six-point scale by a trained observer. Patients and observer were unaware of type of premedication used. Midazolam and hydroxyzine produced significantly (p less than 0.05) greater reduction of anxiety than placebo on both the AVAT and objective anxiety evaluations. Peak onset appeared between 30 and 60 minutes after drug administration. Hemodynamic changes were similar in all groups, and no untoward reactions were encountered before anesthesia. The injection site 24 and 48 hours after administration showed evidence of mild tissue irritation in 68% of patients in group H, 26% of patients in group M, and none of the patients in group P. Midazolam is an efficacious, safe premedicant in relatively healthy patients. It has a prompt onset of action with only minimal tissue irritation.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

H R Vinik, J G Reves, D Wright. 1982. Premedication with intramuscular midazolam: a prospective randomized double-blind controlled study.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6753643/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Event-related potential evidence for the processing efficiency theory.

The purpose of this study was to examine the central tenets of the processing efficiency theory using psychophysiological measures of attention and effort. Twenty-eight participants were divided equally into either a high or low trait anxiety group. They were then required to perform a simulated driving task while responding to one of four target light-emitting diodes. Cortical activity and dual task performance were recorded under two conditions -- baseline and competition -- with cognitive anxiety being elevated in the competitive session by an instructional set. Although driving speed was similar across sessions, a reduction in P3 amplitude to cue onset in the light detection task occurred for both groups during the competitive session, suggesting a reduction in processing efficiency as participants became more state anxious. Our findings provide more comprehensive and mechanistic evidence for processing efficiency theory, and confirm that increases in cognitive anxiety can result in a reduction of processing efficiency with little change in performance effectiveness.

Anxiety↗

Brief report: testing the factorial invariance of the CBCL Somatic Complaints scale as a measure of internalizing symptoms for children with and without chronic illness.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the factorial invariance of the Somatic Complaints subscale of the Child Behavior Checklist as a measure of Internalizing Behavior Problems across a sample of children with and without spina bifida. METHODS: Multisample confirmatory factor analysis was used to compare mother and father report on the Somatic Complaints subscale across a sample of children with spina bifida and a matched comparison sample of able-bodied children ages 8 through 11 years (N = 68 for mother report in each group; N = 54 for father report in the spina bifida group and 53 for the able-bodied group). RESULTS: Although there were no significant between-group differences in the magnitude of factor loadings, significantly more variance in scores on the Somatic Complaints scale was unrelated to Internalizing Behavior Problems for the spina bifida group, compared to the able-bodied group. There were no between-group differences when father data were analyzed, but the latent variable of Internalizing Behavior Problems explained little variance in the Somatic Complaints scale for either group. CONCLUSIONS: Maternal report of Somatic Complaints on the CBCL does not appear to measure Internalizing Behavior Problems in the same manner across groups of children with and without spina bifida. This suggests that the Somatic Complaints subscale should be interpreted with caution when measuring Internalizing Behavior Problems within this population.

Anxiety↗