PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 6872594

Spirometry: what paper speed?

R M Gardner·R O Crapo·R G Billings·J W Shigeoka·J L Hankinson
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Controversy still exists regarding the paper speed necessary for accurate measurements from records of maneuvers for forced vital capacity. Twenty-four spirometric wave forms of known characteristics were plotted by a computer at 1, 2, and 3 cm/sec and were measured in random order by 12 experienced readers. We found that all readers made a surprisingly large number of major errors. The speed of the paper was found to be an important determinant for accurately measuring the forced expiratory volume in one second and the mean forced expiratory flow during the middle half of the forced vital capacity. A minimum paper speed of at least 3 cm/sec is important if spirograms are to be accurately measured by hand. Human errors in measurement may be minimized by obtaining results from at least three acceptable curves, by making duplicate reading of curves, and by making use of validated computerized measurement systems.

Explore related subjects

Forced Expiratory VolumeHumansMaximal Midexpiratory Flow RatePaperSpirometryVital CapacityJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R M Gardner, R O Crapo, R G Billings, J W Shigeoka, J L Hankinson. 1983. Spirometry: what paper speed?. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.84.2.161

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2006

Medical and psychologic outcome of living lobar lung transplant donors.

BACKGROUND: Living donor lobar lung transplantation is a viable therapy for carefully selected patients with end-stage pulmonary disease. Its success is largely dependent upon donor outcome, including both physical and emotional factors. To date, there has been little focus on psychosocial outcomes of lobar lung donors. METHODS: Retrospective evaluation of 15 of 20 living lobar lung transplant donors was performed. Donors underwent evaluation of pulmonary function after recovery from donor lobectomy. Participants completed two self-report questionnaires, the SF-36 Health Survey (SF-36) and the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), as well as an open-ended psychiatric interview. RESULTS: After lobar donation, mean forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)) decreased by 21 +/- 2%, forced vital capacity (FVC) decreased by 16 +/- 3%, total lung capacity (TLC) decreased by 15 +/- 3%, and single-breath diffusing capacity (DLCO) decreased by 14 +/- 4%. All subjects scored higher than the national average on both the physical and mental health components of the SF-36. The BDI scores showed no evidence of clinical depression. However, the subjective interviews elicited two common complaints: (1) a decline in exercise performance, not accounted for by resting lung function measurements; and (2) a dissatisfaction with the degree of acknowledgment of their donation. CONCLUSIONS: Living lobar lung transplant donors enjoy generally satisfactory physical and emotional health. Donors report positive feelings about donation, but wish to be recognized and valued by the transplant team and by the recipient. Despite preservation of lung function within the normal range, some donors also experience a subjective decline in exercise tolerance. Long-term medical and psychologic follow-up appears warranted to monitor symptoms of exercise impairment and to enhance the donor experience.

Forced Expiratory Volume↗