PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 7329733

Systems for human identification.

Abstract

The methods and techniques used in Categories 1, 2, and 3 are the least reliable because of their subjective nature as well as the ever-present potential for human error. These methods are valuable, however, as adjuncts in identification procedures in a total exclusionary and inclusionary comparison. The methods and techniques described in Category 4 have a more scientific basis, but still caution must be used, and, prior to the completion of the death certificate, a complete evaluation should be made of all techniques employed in the identification.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R C Froede, S M Froede, W H Birkby. 1981. Systems for human identification.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7329733/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

DNA evidence: wrong answers or wrong questions?

Much of the controversy over DNA evidence is due to the way in which forensic scientific evidence has classically been presented. The orthodox approach is to consider whether two samples match according to a predetermined criterion. If they do, the fact of match is reported along with an estimate of the frequency of the characteristics. This method fails to address the questions raised in court cases, diverts argument into irrelevancies and stultifies research. Presentation of evidence in the form of likelihood ratios, on the other hand, forces the witness to answer the questions the court is interested in and makes apparent lines of research required to increase our understanding.

Blood Group Antigens