PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 7606376

Ambulatory phlebectomy.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ambulatory phlebectomy (AP) is a gratifying technique that allows one to solve problems otherwise requiring traditional surgery. However, when AP is practiced indiscriminately, results may be disappointing and can tarnish the technique, although there is always a solution to restore the situation. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the defects of AP, their frequency, and to propose solutions for treatment and prevention. METHODS: This study was based on a review of 900 patients who underwent AP with no less than 6 months follow-up. Complications were grouped into three categories: cosmetic, functional, and efficacious (recurrence rates). RESULTS: Cosmetic problems included pigmentation, tattooing, telengiectatic matting, and appearance of new varicose veins. Functional problems included paresthesia and edema. Hematomas disappeared within 3 weeks but sometimes led to pigmentation. CONCLUSIONS: After having analyzed all the reasons for complications, we can formulate logical solutions. Risks may be greatly reduced by strict adherence to proper technique, patient selection, and pretreatment venous mapping. For all complications we found a solution. Sclerotherapy is used in all cases because AP, like all surgical techniques, leads to recurrence when performed alone. In this study, all the described side effects were treated by sclerotherapy, which remains the only solution that gives good results in all cases.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

C Garde. 1995. Ambulatory phlebectomy.. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4725.1995.tb00520.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

The role of gait analysis in the orthopaedic management of ambulatory cerebral palsy.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The literature was reviewed to describe the role of gait analysis in the orthopaedic management of ambulatory children with cerebral palsy and examine the current best evidence to support these roles. RECENT FINDINGS: Gait laboratory analysis is superior to visual or observational analysis of gait because it provides an objective record of gait that is able to quantify the magnitude of deviations of pathologic gait from normal and also explain these abnormalities. Recognizable gait patterns can be classified and used for making treatment decisions, the effectiveness of which can be assessed using gait analysis as a measure of gait outcomes. There are many sources of variability, however, including patients themselves, the gait laboratories and testing processes, interpretation of data and surgeons' surgical recommendations. SUMMARY: Although gait analysis has been shown to alter decision making, there is little evidence that the decisions based on gait analysis lead to better outcomes. Consequently, clinical gait analysis remains controversial, with wide variation in the rates of utilization of gait analysis in the management of children with ambulatory cerebral palsy. The time is ripe for clinical trials and cohort studies to provide the evidence to establish the appropriate utilization of this technology.

Ambulatory Surgical Procedures↗