PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 7706027

Vertical optic disk diameter: discrepancy between planimetric and SLO measurements.

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare measurements of the vertical diameter of the optic disk using the Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph (HRT) and planimetric methods. METHODS: On the HRT, three measurements of the vertical disk diameter were made on 32 eyes from a composite image using the circle draw facility and were compared with three measurements of the central image of the 32 tomographic cuts. These were repeated by a second observer. Measurements were compared with those obtained from photographs using the three corrections described by Bengtsson and Krakau. RESULTS: For the HRT, there was minimal intraobserver variation, coefficient of variation (1.515% to 1.882% for the two observers). Interobserver variation was also small (CoV 1.969%). The authors found the closest agreement with the HRT measurements using regression analysis was obtained using correction 3 (r = 0.8258). HRT measurements were significantly smaller (P < 0.0001) by a constant amount of 0.13 mm across the range of optic disk size. There was a significant difference between the HRT measurement of the composite image and the central cut (P = 0.0003 for observer 1). CONCLUSIONS: HRT measurements are significantly smaller than those from photographs and, therefore, are not interchangeable.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A F Spencer, S A Sadiq, P Pawson, S A Vernon. 1995. Vertical optic disk diameter: discrepancy between planimetric and SLO measurements.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7706027/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Do scleral flap dimensions influence reliability of intraocular pressure control in experimental trabeculectomy?

AIM: To compare the effect on intraocular pressure (IOP) of large vs small scleral flap size during trabeculectomy using adjustable sutures. METHODS: Trabeculectomy operations were performed on nine donor human eyes connected to a constant flow infusion with real-time IOP monitoring. Large scleral flaps (4 x 4 mm, 16 mm(2), n=12) or small scleral flaps (3 x 2 mm, 6 mm(2), n=9) were constructed over 0.76 mm(2) sclerostomies. For each procedure, equilibrium IOP was measured following tight closure with two four-throw adjustable 10-0 nylon sutures. RESULTS: Five scleral flaps were thin or poorly constructed; four of these were in the initial seven procedures, implying learning effect. These had a mean absolute IOP of 7.6 mmHg (range 2.7-12.4 mmHg) and mean relative IOP of 28.3% of baseline (range 10-45.8%) after closure. In the remaining 16 good quality procedures, mean IOP was 1.3 mmHg (range 0-3.4 mmHg) after sclerostomy, confirming minimal outflow resistance before closure. Following flap closure mean IOP was 20 mmHg (SD 4.4, range 15.5-29.3 mmHg) for large (n=8), and 18.7 mmHg (SD 3.6, 15.9-25.8 mmHg) for small (n=8) flaps (unpaired t-test, P=0.26). Mean IOP (% baseline) was 71.6% (SD 8.4, range 60.6-86.6%) and 66% (SD=12.7, 46.8-86.6%) for large and small flap groups, respectively (unpaired t-test, P=0.2). CONCLUSIONS: Well-constructed scleral flaps of both sizes were able to support an average IOP at least two-thirds of baseline, and both had similar absolute IOP levels. Errors in flap construction resulted in loss of IOP control. Smaller flap size does not appear to compromise control of early postoperative IOP using adjustable sutures.

Glaucoma↗