PubMed · 7707723
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
J H Murthy, S R Hiremagalur, D R Ginn. 1995. P-pulmonale.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7707723/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Sixteen patients in sinus rhythm at baseline undergoing implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation were monitored with transesophageal echocardiography both before and after direct current cardioversion with currents of 15 to 20 J, for any direct current induced atrial dysfunction. We found no change in the indexes of atrial function or appearance of spontaneous echo contrast in the immediate postshock period by intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography.
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine whether restrictive left ventricular (LV) filling patterns are associated with diastolic ventricular interaction in patients with chronic heart failure. BACKGROUND: We recently demonstrated a diastolic ventricular interaction in approximately 50% of a series of patients with chronic heart failure, as evidenced by paradoxic increases in LV end-diastolic volume despite reductions in right ventricular end-diastolic volume during volume unloading achieved by lower body negative pressure (LBNP). We reasoned that such an interaction would impede LV filling in mid and late diastole, but would be minimal in early diastole, resulting in a restrictive LV filling pattern. METHODS: Transmitral flow was assessed using pulsed wave Doppler echocardiography in 30 patients with chronic heart failure and an LV ejection fraction < or = 35%. Peak early (E) and atrial (A) filling velocities and E wave deceleration time were measured. Left ventricular end-diastolic volume was measured using radionuclide ventriculography before and during -30-mm Hg LBNP. RESULTS: Nine of the 11 patients with and 2 of the 16 patients without restrictive LV filling patterns (E/A > 2 or E/A 1 to 2 and E wave deceleration time < or = 140 ms) increased LV end-diastolic volume during LBNP (p = 0.001). The change in LV end-diastolic volume during LBNP was correlated with the baseline A wave velocity (r = -0.52, p = 0.005) and E/A ratio (r = 0.50, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Restrictive LV filling patterns are associated with diastolic ventricular interaction in patients with chronic heart failure. Volume unloading in the setting of diastolic ventricular interaction allows for increased LV filling. Identifying patients with chronic heart failure and restrictive filling patterns may therefore indicate a group likely to benefit from additional vasodilator therapy.
Limited data are available concerning the influence of altered loading conditions on left atrial (LA) function. In addition, the underlying mechanism of the augmentation of atrial filling (A) velocity (assessed by transmitral Doppler measurement) after treatment of heart failure has been less studied. Therefore, we examined various indexes of LA function during the depression of left ventricular (LV) filling pressure resulting from treatment of heart failure. Twelve patients with LV dysfunction (ejection fraction < 50%) underwent right heart catheterization and transthoracic echocardiography before and after optimal treatment of heart failure. LV/LA volume and ejection fraction and mitral and pulmonary venous flow velocities were measured. LV stiffness (substitute for LA afterload) was assessed by the ratio of LV filling pressure to LV end-diastolic volume. After treatment of heart failure, the mitral A velocity significantly increased (38 +/- 9 to 58 +/- 16 cm/sec, p < 0.005) and there was a distinct attenuation of the difference of the pulmonary venous and mitral A-wave duration (43 +/- 29 to -8 +/- 31 msec, p < 0.005). These findings were associated with a marked decrease in LV stiffness (0.12 +/- 0.04 to 0.05 +/- 0.02 mm Hg/ml, p = 0.0001) and an increase in LA ejection fraction (27% +/- 7% to 38% +/- 8%, p < 0.005). There was a significant curvilinear relation between LA ejection fraction and LV stiffness (r = 0.63, p < 0.01). The mitral A velocity correlated positively with LA ejection fraction (r = 0.77, p < 0.0001) and inversely with LV stiffness (r = -0.52, p < 0.01). The reversible LA dysfunction suggests that the initial LA dysfunction is due to LA afterload mismatch rather than intrinsic LA disease, which also contributes to the augmentation of the mitral A velocity after heart failure treatment.