PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 7714931

Microbiological methods for assessing handwashing practice in hygiene behaviour studies.

Abstract

Personal hygiene, especially handwashing, is frequently mentioned as an important aspect of diarrhoeal disease prevention in water and sanitation programmes. Handwashing practice is difficult to assess but the microbiological analysis of hands shows promise as an indicator of this behaviour. Most methods for isolating bacteria from the hands have been developed for use in hospitals in order to investigate the spread of nosocomial infections. However, reliable and inexpensive methods which need only limited expertise are needed for use in developing countries where diarrhoeal diseases remain a major health risk. Techniques for sampling hands and bacteriological analysis methods are discussed with special emphasis on practical considerations for conducting tests in developing countries. Several studies have used these methods successfully and have investigated hygiene behaviour and how living conditions affect behaviour and the role of hands in diarrhoeal disease transmission. We recommend the use of impression plates for isolating faecal indicator bacteria from the hands and also recommend faecal streptococci as an indicator of faecal contamination.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

E C Kaltenthaler, J V Pinfold. 1995. Microbiological methods for assessing handwashing practice in hygiene behaviour studies.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7714931/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Costs of surgeries in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic literature review.

BACKGROUND: Surgical care is essential for achieving global health equity, yet low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) face major gaps in access and planning, partly due to limited evidence on the costs and resource requirements of surgical interventions. Understanding these costs is vital for designing efficient and equitable health systems. METHODS: We conducted a systematic literature review (covering MEDLINE, EMBASE, Global Health, EconLit and grey literature) to identify studies reporting the costs of surgeries in LMICs from January 2000 to June 2023. Minor and major surgical procedures were considered, focusing on therapeutic procedures (excluding diagnostic interventions). Studies that clearly identified, quantified and costed hospital resources and services deployed in the provision of surgical care, and included at least two of the surgical production factors (ie, consumables, diagnostics, personnel, infrastructure and overhead) in the costing were included. Costs were standardised to 2023 International dollars (I$) for comparability. RESULTS: A total of 74 studies from 29 countries met the inclusion criteria, with 210 cost estimates across 65 procedure groups. Costs varied widely: from I$1.54 for a caesarean section in Tanzania to I$618 098 for paediatric cataract surgery in Zambia. Full costing studies reported higher estimates than partial costing studies. Most studies (60%) originated from upper-middle-income countries, with limited data (10%) from low-income settings. CONCLUSION: This review provides a reference list of surgical procedure costs across LMICs, highlighting considerable cost variation by procedure, specialty and country. The findings underscore the need for better-quality, standardised cost data-especially from low-income countries-to inform national surgical plans, universal health coverage benefit packages and reimbursement policies.

Developing Countries↗