[Ultraviolet rays and their dermatologic application].

Z Zahorcsek; I Schneider

Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 7761075

[Ultraviolet rays and their dermatologic application].

Z Zahorcsek·I Schneider

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

After describing the landmark results achieved so far in studying the effects of ultraviolet radiation (UVR), the authors go on to present their achievements and they point out those areas of dermatology where UVR can be applied. In connection with the letter, the authors show the latest treatment theories; indications, contraindications, treatment pattern, acute and chronic side effects. Finally, the authors give a brief summary on the interdisciplinary application of UVR.

Explore related subjects

Adjuvants, Immunologic Contraindications Female Graft Rejection Graft vs Host Reaction Humans Immune System Immunosuppression Therapy Male PUVA Therapy Plasmapheresis Skin Ultraviolet Therapy Journal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Z Zahorcsek, I Schneider. 1995-05-21. [Ultraviolet rays and their dermatologic application].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7761075/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed1999

Soluble HLA class I, HLA class II, and Fas ligand in blood components: a possible key to explain the immunomodulatory effects of allogeneic blood transfusions.

The immunomodulatory effect of allogeneic blood transfusions (ABT) has been known for many years. However, a complete understanding of the effects of ABT on the recipient's immune system has remained elusive. Soluble HLA class I (sHLA-I), HLA class II (sHLA-II), and Fas ligand (sFasL) molecules may play immunoregulatory roles. We determined by double-determinant immunoenzymatic assay (DDIA) sHLA-I, sHLA-II, and sFasL concentrations in different blood components. sHLA-I and sFasL levels in red blood cells (RBCs) stored for up to 30 days and in random-donor platelets are significantly (P <.001) higher than in other blood components and their amount is proportionate to the number of residual donor leukocytes and to the length of storage. Blood components with high sHLA-I and sFasL levels play immunoregulatory roles in vitro as in allogeneic mixed lymphocyte responses (MLR) and antigen-specific cytotoxic T-cell (CTL) activity, and induce apoptosis in Fas-positive cells. These data suggest that soluble molecules in blood components are functional. If these results are paralleled in vivo, they should be taken into account in transfusion practice. Blood components that can cause immunosuppression should be chosen to induce transplantation tolerance, whereas blood components that lack immunosuppressive effects should be preferred to reduce the risk of postoperative complications and cancer recurrence.

Adjuvants, Immunologic↗

PubMed1999

Lymphotactin acts as an innate mucosal adjuvant.

Lymphotactin (Lptn) is a C chemokine produced predominantly by NK and CD8-positive (CD8+) T cells including gammadelta TCR-positive (TCR+) intraepithelial lymphocytes. Lptn is chemotactic for NK and T cells and likely plays an important role in maintaining the integrity of the epithelium and in mucosal immune responses. In this study, we characterized the immune responses to OVA given intranasally with Lptn to mice. This regimen enhanced OVA-specific serum Ab responses and Ab titers in mucosal secretions. Lptn also enhanced OVA-specific Ab-forming cells in mucosal and systemic compartments. CD4-positive (CD4+) T cells isolated from mucosal compartments and spleens of mice intranasally immunized with OVA plus Lptn displayed higher OVA-specific proliferative responses and greater synthesis of IFN-gamma, IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, and IL-10 than did CD4+ T cells from mice given OVA without Lptn. These studies indicate that Lptn has adjuvant properties and suggest that Lptn present in the mucosa has the potential to enhance mucosal and systemic Ab responses through help provided by Th1- and Th2-type cells to link the initial innate signals of the mucosa with the acquired immune system.

Adjuvants, Immunologic↗

PubMed1999

TCR vaccines against T cell lymphoma: QS-21 and IL-12 adjuvants induce a protective CD8+ T cell response.

Tumor-specific TCR can serve as an effective target for active immunotherapy of T cell malignancies. Using the murine T cell tumor model C6VL, vaccination with C6VL TCR protected mice from a subsequent lethal dose of tumor cells. This study characterizes the immune mechanisms involved in the tumor protection, and the influence of immunologic adjuvants in inducing a protective immune response. Immune responses induced by TCR vaccines formulated with various adjuvants: QS-21, IL-12, SAF-1, CD40L, and GM-CSF were compared. QS-21, IL-12, and SAF-1 biased the humoral immune response toward Th1-type, reflected by the induction of IgG2a and IgG2b anti-C6VL TCR Abs. CD40L and GM-CSF exclusively produced IgG1 Abs, reflecting a Th2-type immune response. In our tumor model system, only vaccines containing adjuvants that induced a Th1-type immune response favored tumor protection. Furthermore, we demonstrated that CD8+ T cells were necessary and sufficient for tumor protection using anti-CD8 mAb depletion and adoptive cell transfer experiments. Transfer of hyperimmune serum containing anti-C6VL TCR Abs into na ive mice had modest anti-tumor effects and was not sufficient to prevent tumor growth. TCR-vaccinated B cell-deficient mice were not protected against C6VL tumor, and tumor protection was not completely restored after hyperimmune serum transfer. Thus, B cells may serve as important APCs in inducing a protective immune response. Based on these results future TCR vaccines should be designed to maintain native TCR conformation, as well as induce a strong Th1-type immune response.

Adjuvants, Immunologic↗