PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 7775813

[The relation between delivery method and prognosis for very low birth weight infants].

Abstract

To further understand the relationship between perinatal factors and prognosis (neonatal and infantile death and major handicaps), we retrospectively studied 128 singletons weighing less than 1,500g (very low birth weight; VLBW) infants, without maternal complications, IUGR or major congenital anomalies. The gestational age (mean +/- SD) at delivery and the birth weight (mean +/- SD) of subjects were 27.1 +/- 2.0 weeks and 1,041.1 +/- 264.1g, respectively. The results of the current study were as follows: 1) Malpresentation, low Apgar score (APS) and Respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) were observed more frequently in non-intact survivors than in intact survivors with statistical significance. Although the occurrence of fetal distress was correlated with low pH in the umbilical artery, no significant correlation was evident between the prognosis and either of the two above mentioned factors. The intact survivors had a significantly high frequency of PROM despite no correlation with signs of infection (WBC, CRP). 2) As to delivery methods in terms of prognosis, a cephalic-vaginal group had the best prognosis and a breech-vaginal group had the worst, with statistical significance. A higher frequency of poor prognosis for infants was found in a malpresentation group with cesarean delivery and cervical dilation of more than 4cm. Thus, vaginal delivery is a possible option in case of cephalic VLBW infants.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

E Kato, H Yamada, K Hanatani, Y Matsumoto, S Hattori, S Fujimoto. 1995. [The relation between delivery method and prognosis for very low birth weight infants].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7775813/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Effects of teamwork training on adverse outcomes and process of care in labor and delivery: a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of teamwork training on the occurrence of adverse outcomes and process of care in labor and delivery. METHODS: A cluster-randomized controlled trial was conducted at seven intervention and eight control hospitals. The intervention was a standardized teamwork training curriculum based on crew resource management that emphasized communication and team structure. The primary outcome was the proportion of deliveries at 20 weeks or more of gestation in which one or more adverse maternal or neonatal outcomes or both occurred (Adverse Outcome Index). Additional outcomes included 11 clinical process measures. RESULTS: A total of 1,307 personnel were trained and 28,536 deliveries analyzed. At baseline, there were no differences in demographic or delivery characteristics between the groups. The mean Adverse Outcome Index prevalence was similar in the control and intervention groups, both at baseline and after implementation of teamwork training (9.4% versus 9.0% and 7.2% versus 8.3%, respectively). The intracluster correlation coefficient was 0.015, with a resultant wide confidence interval for the difference in mean Adverse Outcome Index between groups (-5.6% to 3.2%). One process measure, the time from the decision to perform an immediate cesarean delivery to the incision, differed significantly after team training (33.3 minutes versus 21.2 minutes, P=.03). CONCLUSION: Training, as was conducted and implemented, did not transfer to a detectable impact in this study. The Adverse Outcome Index could be an important tool for comparing obstetric outcomes within and between institutions to help guide quality improvement. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: (www.ClinicalTrials.gov), NCT00381056 LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.

Delivery, Obstetric↗