PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 7776183

Empathic accuracy in a clinically relevant setting.

Abstract

This study addressed 3 questions regarding empathic accuracy in a clinically relevant setting. First, does the empathic accuracy of a perceiver improve with increased exposure to a target individual? Second, can empathic accuracy be enhanced by providing the perceiver with feedback about the target's actual thoughts and feelings? Third, are there stable individual differences in empathic accuracy that generalize across different targets? The results indicated that although absolute performance levels varied from 1 target to another, empathic accuracy generally improved with increased exposure to the target. In addition, feedback concerning the target's actual thoughts and feelings accelerated the rate at which the perceivers' empathic accuracy improved. Finally, cross-target consistency in responding (alpha = .86) revealed stable individual differences in the perceivers' empathic ability. Implications of these findings for clinical training and practice are discussed.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

C Marangoni, S Garcia, W Ickes, G Teng. 1995. Empathic accuracy in a clinically relevant setting.. https://doi.org/10.1037/%2F0022-3514.68.5.854

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Explaining regional differences in suicide rates.

Social characteristics of the states of America in 1959-1961 predicted the suicide rate of those born in noncontiguous states and abroad, but not the suicide rates of those born in-state or in contiguous states. The results were seen as supporting the selective migration explanation of state suicide rates and as not supporting composition and local area explanations.

Divorce

Testing Gibbs and Martin's theory of suicide.

Over 32 nations, status integration correlated more strongly with suicide rates than two other social variables. Over 30 states of the United States of America, status integration performed worse than the percent born out-of-state and better than the divorce rates.

Divorce