PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 7858638

[MRI: overview, technique, interpretation].

E Challier·M F Bellin·J Grellet
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to describe the general principle of MRI, emphasising the practical conduct of the examination which consists of three main phases. The authors define the concepts of relaxation time and T1 and T2, essential parameters for the understanding of MRI. They simply explain how to recognise a predominance of T1- or T2-weighting on MRI images. They review the principal artefacts which must be recognised in order to avoid erroneous interpretation of the images. Lastly, they define the value of MRI in clinical urology, renal pathology, especially neoplastic, and prostatic and bladder disease.

Explore related subjects

ArtifactsContraindicationsHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleProstatic DiseasesUrologic DiseasesJournal ArticleReview

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

E Challier, M F Bellin, J Grellet. 1994. [MRI: overview, technique, interpretation].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7858638/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2026

Striping artifact removal in VisiumHD data through nuclear counts modeling.

MOTIVATION: 10x Genomics VisiumHD enables spatial transcriptomics at 2 µm × 2 µm resolution but exhibits slide-specific, non-periodic striping artifacts due to lane-width variability. These multiplicative row/column effects distort bin total counts and can bias downstream analyses. The state-of-the-art destriping approach is the normalization procedure used as a preprocessing step in bin2cell; it applies sequential high-quantile row- then column-wise normalization, which is asymmetric and can introduce edge effects/macro-stripes and distortions of large-scale total-count structure. RESULTS: We propose a statistical destriping approach that leverages nuclei segmentation from the co-registered H&E image. Assuming transcript abundance is constant within each nucleus, we model bin counts with a negative binomial distribution whose mean is a product of a nucleus-specific concentration and row- and column-specific stripe-factors reflecting lane-width variation. We fit all parameters in a generalized linear modeling framework with cross-validated regularization on stripe-factors and iterative dispersion estimation, and use the fitted parameters to correct the observed counts into a destriped image. On synthetic data with known ground truth, our method improves stripe-factor estimation accuracy and reduces error in corrected counts relative to bin2cell and bin2cell-derived baselines. Across four public VisiumHD slides, it consistently lowers striping intensity while substantially better preserving biological signal present in the large-scale global count structure and avoiding the artifacts introduced by other methods. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: All source code and links to publicly available data used for this study are available at https://github.com/paolamalsot/destriping-GLM.

Artifacts↗
PubMed1999

Matrix interferences in the analysis of benzene in urine.

The analysis of benzene in urine of the general population or of exposed workers can be performed with different methods using the 'purge and trap' or 'solid-phase microextraction' techniques in combination with gas chromatographic analysis and photoionisation or mass spectrometric detection. The published results, however, are deeply conflicting. Differences in sample preparation by different research groups and our own preliminary observations prompted us to investigate pre-analytical and analytical factors potentially capable of modifying the urinary benzene quantification results. Benzene concentrations were measured in 20 urine samples in relation to different conditioning conditions (at 24, 40 and 80 degrees C) and at basic or acid pH. Urinary protein concentrations were measured in the same samples. Urine heating at 80 degrees C yields benzene concentrations on average five times higher than at 24 degrees C. On acidification of urine, the benzene released increases up to 28-fold in comparison to that obtained at uncorrected 'physiological' pH. Despite a widely scattered data distribution, a statistically significant linear correlation was found between 'heat-released' and 'acid-labile' benzene values. There was no correlation between total urinary proteins present in 'physiological' concentrations (between 12 and 110 mg/l) and the different kinds of benzene in urine. Our results could perhaps be explained if it is supposed that part of the benzene in urine is absorbed onto sediment, or bound to specific proteins, or derived from parent molecules and is released with pH modification or heat administration. Our observations may also help to explain why the urinary benzene concentrations reported by different investigators vary considerably even when environmental levels are comparable.

Artifacts↗
PubMed1999

Correcting for artifacts in complex aqueous solutions when using the pH-sensitive dye 2',7'-bis-(2-carboxyethyl)- 5-(and -6)carboxyfluorescein.

The pH-sensitive fluorescent indicator dye 2', 7'-bis-(2-carboxyethyl)-5-(and -6)carboxyfluorescein (BCECF) is routinely used to measure intracellular pH within cells. Surprisingly, no studies have been performed to see if various solution parameters modulate the fluorescence intensity of BCECF even though viscosity artifacts have been reported for particular Ca2+ selective dyes. In this report we demonstrate that even minor increases in the concentration of a number of different agents significantly decrease the excitation fluorescence intensity at two wavelengths routinely used to determine solution pH. Solution viscosity was varied using a number of different agents including glycerol, sucrose, polyethylene glycol, polyvinylpyrrolidone, and methylcellulose. In general, there was a detectable and significant decrease in the maximum fluorescence excitation ratio as the viscosity was increased, although the effect was more dramatic with Newtonian solutions than with non-Newtonian solutions. This same general effect was seen at pH 6.5, 7.0, and 7.3, a range of pH levels where BCECF is found to be particularly sensitive. To correct for these artifactually low values we used different combinations of excitation wavelengths to determine which could be used to accurately measure pH while minimizing the artifact. Choosing excitation wavelengths so that excitation ratios were collected at 470 and 435 nm allowed a significant signal to quantitatively measure pH while the artifact was nearly abolished.

Artifacts↗