PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 7881881

Eye splashes during invasive vascular procedures.

Abstract

In recent years there has been an increased awareness among health care workers regarding possible risk of nosocomial transmission of blood borne pathogens. The aim of this study is to document the risk of contamination of radiologists' eyes during invasive vascular procedures. Radiologists performing these examinations were asked to wear glasses throughout. After each examination the glasses were inspected for droplets. 150 procedures were performed on 123 patients (M = 80, F = 43). 10 procedures (6.7%) resulted in splashes to glasses. In four of these cases the radiologist was not aware of the "eye splash" nor was there a spray event to account for it. Radiologists were aware of 13 spray events (8.7% of all procedures). There was a significantly increased risk of spray events and eye splashes during thrombolysis (chi 2 = 14.93, p < 0.001) and of spray events during angioplasty when compared with perfemoral arteriography (chi 2 = 8.816, p < 0.01). Procedures lasting longer than 30 min were associated with a significantly increased risk of spray events (chi 2 = 5.63, p < 0.02). Significantly more eye splashes were associated with more than two catheter changes (chi 2 = 8.912, p < 0.01). It is suggested that protective eye wear should be used routinely during invasive vascular procedures.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

I R Davidson, A J Crisp, D C Hinwood, S C Whitaker, R H Gregson. 1995. Eye splashes during invasive vascular procedures.. https://doi.org/10.1259/0007-1285-68-805-39

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Transhepatic vascular access for diagnostic and interventional procedures: techniques, outcome, and complications.

Early or multiple cardiac catheterizations may result in occlusion of the femoral veins prohibiting their use. The internal jugular or sub-clavian approach may be an appropriate alternative. However, these approaches may not be suitable in patients with surgical interruption of the superior vena cava. In other patients, they may not allow easy access to certain areas of the heart. The transhepatic approach is an important alternative route for performing cardiac catheterization and interventions. Depending on the planned procedure, it may be the preferred route to perform the cardiac catheterization even in the presence of patent femoral veins. The indications, technical details and potential complications of this approach are discussed.

Angiography↗

Embolization for a bleeding pelvic fracture in a patient with persistent sciatic artery.

Emergency embolization for a bleeding pelvic fracture was performed in a patient with persistent sciatic artery, a rare anatomic variation in which the internal iliac artery continues to the popliteal artery. Successful hemostasis was achieved without complications by means of selective catheterization into each branch of the internal iliac artery. Awareness of this unusual vascular anatomy is critically important to avoid serious complication of emergency embolization.

Angiography↗