PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 7890007

Sacral root stimulation for controlled defecation.

Abstract

Selective rectal or sphincter neurostimulation aiming at controlled defecation was performed in 10 dogs. While the dogs were under anesthesia, the rectal and rectal neck pressures, balloon expulsion as well as external anal sphincter (EAS) response to stimulation of the second sacral ventral nerve root (S2) and its autonomic and somatic branches were determined. Each of these nerves was stimulated separately using bipolar platinum cuff electrodes. S2 stimulation resulted in rectal and rectal neck pressure elevation as well as increase of EMG activity of EAS without balloon expulsion. Autonomic branch stimulation effected rectal pressure increase and balloon expulsion, while somatic branch stimulation caused increase of rectal neck pressure and EAS EMG activity with no balloon expulsion. S2 stimulation with somatic branch transection produced rectal pressure elevation and balloon expulsion. In contrast to rectal pressure, the rectal neck pressure increased with increasing stimulus frequency. In conclusion, rectal evacuation and sphincteric control could be induced by selective sacral root electrostimulation: S2 stimulation with transection of the somatic branch for the former and pudendal branch stimulation for the latter.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A Shafik. 1995. Sacral root stimulation for controlled defecation.. https://doi.org/10.1159/000129374

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Clinical examination and complimentary investigations of the anus].

Precise history-taking and a complete clinical examination including all the components of the perineum guide diagnosis in anorectal disorders and most often indicate treatment. Ancillary investigations are sometimes needed for more precise diagnosis or to complete pretreatment workup. Such additional investigations should always be discussed, indicated and interpreted in view of the clinical examination.

Anal Canal↗

Electrical impedance, a sensory system for detection of rectal filling after anorectal reconstruction: experimental study of rectal impedance measurements and defecation in dogs.

BACKGROUND: Total anorectal reconstruction with dynamic graciloplasty is an alternative to a permanent colostomy; however, perfect continence cannot be achieved because of loss of sensitivity. This study was designed in dogs to determine whether monitoring of rectal electric impedance can give information about fullness or motility of the rectum. METHODS: Four adult female beagle dogs underwent rectal electric impedance measurements using a bipolar electrode implanted on the rectal wall. An alternating current of 1 microA at a frequency of 4 kHz was applied between the two wires. Variations of impedance (called impedance waves), defecations, and weight of stools were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: The basal rectal impedance was 682+/-19 omega. During the period of observation (n = 4), 84 impedance waves (amplitude, 72+/-2 omega; duration, 58+/-11 minutes) were observed and 33 defecations (weight of stools, 74+/-6 g) occurred. Four types of impedance waves were identified and classified into two groups: low-amplitude or short-duration waves (Types I, II, and III), and high-amplitude and long-duration waves (Type IV). Frequency of defecation was associated with the amplitude of the waves. The weight of stools was correlated with the duration of the waves (r = 0.574, n = 27, P = 0.002). Types I, II, and III waves were correlated with eventual partial defecations, whereas Type IV waves were correlated with complete defecations. After defecation, no spontaneous new defecation occurred before recovering at least 80 percent of the basal impedance. CONCLUSIONS: Rectal impedance variations are correlated with defecation in a canine model, and single bipolar measurements provide a suitable evaluation of rectum fullness. This suggests the possible use of impedance signals to control electrostimulated graciloplasty after anorectal reconstruction.

Anal Canal↗