PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 803182

Acrylic cement stabilized joint replacements.

Abstract

Surgical management of osteoarthritis, aseptic necrosis and rheumatoid arthritis has been revolutionized by the introduction of acrylic cement-stabilized joint surface replacement. Although single joint surface replacements have been employed extensively for more than half a century, total surface replacement operations with a wear-resistant high-density polyethylene and noncorrosive stainless steel stabilized by acrylic cement were introduced only a little more than 12 years ago. This evolved with Charnley's discovery of the high level of bone tolerance for acrylic cement. Acrylic cement made it possible mechanically to bond artificial joint surfaces to the bone ends and produce an insensitive Charcot-like functioning joint. A barium sulfate additive makes the cement radiopaque for visualizing the bone-cement interface. Barium sulfate additive also lowers the polymerization temperature and opens the polymer for influx of interstitial fluids. Antibiotics have also been added to the cement for prevention and treatment of infection of the surrounding tissues. In aged individuals with cardiovascular disease, the absorption of the acrylic monomer depresses cardiac output and produces hypotension for 2-5 minutes after impaction of acrylic cement into spongy bone. The hypotension has been minimized by cautious fluid replacement and maintenance of adequate blood volume before, during and after the operation. Approximately 30,000 total hip arthroplasties are performed in the United States annually in patients older than 50 years of age with fractured femoral head replacements, bilateral rheumatoid arthritis, old neglected congenital dislocations of the hip or osteonecrosis with and without osteoarthritis. The pain relief is more complete and the functional improvement more predictable than in any other previously recommended surgical operation for the purpose. For this reason, total hip arthroplasty has almost completely supplanted mold-arthroplasty, osteotomy, capsulotomy (hanging hip) and resection of the femoral head. Hemiarthroplasty in the form of femoral head replacement still is the procedure of choice in patients with fractures of the neck of the femur and a normal acetabular articular cartilage, irrespective of age. As a countermeasure against loosening of the prosthesis in patients with osteoporosis and a hollow proximal end of the femur, the stem can be stabilized with acrylic cement. A standard replaceable femoral head for subsequent conversion of femoral head replacement to total hip arthroplasty is an important consideration and presently is under investigation in several medical centers.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M R Urist. 1975. Acrylic cement stabilized joint replacements.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0011-3840(75)80007-4

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Covalent immobilization of redox enzyme on electrospun nonwoven poly(acrylonitrile-co-acrylic acid) nanofiber mesh filled with carbon nanotubes: a comprehensive study.

In this work, novel conductive composite nanofiber mesh possessing reactive groups was electrospun from solutions containing poly(acrylonitrile-co-acrylic acid) (PANCAA) and multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) for redoxase immobilization, assuming that the incorporated MWCNTs could behave as electrons transferor during enzyme catalysis. The covalent immobilization of catalase from bovine liver on the neat PANCAA nanofiber mesh or the composite one was processed in the presence of EDC/NHS. Results indicated that both the amount and activity retention of bound catalase on the composite nanofiber mesh were higher than those on the neat PANCAA nanofiber mesh, and the activity increased up to 42%. Kinetic parameters, K(m) and V(max), for the catalases immobilized on the composite nanofiber mesh were lower and higher than those on the neat one, respectively. This enhanced activity might be ascribed to either promoted electron transfer through charge-transfer complexes and the pi system of carbon nanotubes or rendered biocompatibility by modified MWCNTs. Furthermore, the immobilized catalases revealed much more stability after MWCNTs were incorporated into the polymer nanofiber mesh. However, there was no significant difference in optimum pH value and temperature, thermal stability and operational stability between these two immobilized preparations, while the two ones appeared more advantageous than the free in these properties. The effect of MWCNTs incorporation on another redox enzyme, peroxidase, was also studied and it was found that the activity increased by 68% in comparison of composite one with neat preparation.

Acrylates↗

The effect of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of composite resin materials.

AIMS: The aims of this study were to evaluate the effect of various finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of six different composite resin materials (Artemis Enamel, TPH Spectrum, Filtek A-110, Filtek Supreme Enamel, Solitaire 2, and Filtek P-60) as well as to evaluate the effectiveness of the surface sealant application (BisCover) on the surface roughness after finishing and polishing procedures of tested composites. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Specimens (n=168) measuring 5 mm in diameter x 2 mm in thickness were fabricated in a plexiglass well covered with a Mylar strip using six composite resins. A control group of seven specimens of each material received no polishing after being cured under the Mylar strip. Twenty-one specimens for each composite were randomly divided among three finishing and polishing groups (n=7). Each group was polished using a different system: Carbide bur/Sof-Lex disc, Carbide bur/Enhance disc with polishing paste, and Carbide bur/Edenta composite finishing kit. The average surface roughness (Ra, microm) of the control and treated specimens were measured with the Mitutoyo Surftest-402 Surface Roughness tester. After a surface sealant (BisCover) was applied to all treated specimens, according to manufacturer's instructions, the average roughness (Ra) was measured again. Results were statistically analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the post-hoc Scheffe's test at a p<0.05 significance level. RESULTS: Significant differences were found for the surface roughness (p<0.05) with interaction among composite resins and the finishing systems used (p<0.05). Enhance/Biscover finishing and polishing procedure surface was not significantly different from the Mylar strip surface groups (p>0.05). The Mylar strip group was not significantly different from the Sof-Lex/BisCover and Edenta/BisCover groups. The ranking of mean Ra values by materials was as follows: Filtek Supreme Enamel < Filtek A110 < TPH Spectrum < Artemis <Filtek P-60 < Solitaire 2. The ranking of mean Ra values by polishing systems was as follows: Enhance/BisCover < Mylar Strip < Sof-Lex/BisCover < Edenta/BisCover < Sof-Lex < Enhance < Edenta. CONCLUSION: Smoother surfaces were recorded for the Enhance/BisCover and the Mylar strip-formed surface groups. The composite finishing kit Edenta significantly increased the Ra for all tested composites (p<0.05). But after finishing with Edenta, the use of a surface sealant (BisCover) significantly improved the surface smoothness of all tested composites (p<0.05). Use of BisCover surface sealant on anterior and posterior resin composite restorations after finishing and polishing procedures is recommended.

Acrylates↗