PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 8044448

Cognitive performance in learning disabled children with and without epilepsy.

Abstract

Cognitive functioning and educational achievement were examined in learning disabled children with epilepsy (n = 65) and without epilepsy (n = 122) in order to explore whether children with epilepsy show unique types of learning problems, different from those in other learning disabled children. The learning disabled children with epilepsy tended to perform better on tests of verbal intelligence, certain achievement-related abilities and were better in one area of academic achievement, i.e. spelling. Despite their superior performance in these areas, the learning disabled children with epilepsy were slower than those without epilepsy and regular education controls (n = 100) on simple auditory and visual reaction tasks as well as on a multiple decision reaction task and a visual searching task. The results obtained with the school achievement tasks provide no clear evidence for specific types of learning impairment in children with epilepsy. Learning disabled children with epilepsy do not appear to have educational needs different from those of other learning disabled children.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J Vermeulen, S W Kortstee, W C Alpherts, A P Aldenkamp. 1994. Cognitive performance in learning disabled children with and without epilepsy.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1059-1311(05)80157-8

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

A low glycaemic index breakfast cereal preferentially prevents children's cognitive performance from declining throughout the morning.

This study investigated whether the glycaemic index (GI) of breakfast cereal differentially affects children's attention and memory. Using a balanced cross-over design, on two consecutive mornings 64 children aged 6-11 years were given a high GI cereal and a low GI cereal in a counterbalanced order. They performed a series of computerised tests of attention and memory, once prior to breakfast and three times following breakfast at hourly intervals. The results indicate that children's performance declines throughout the morning and that this decline can be significantly reduced following the intake of a low GI cereal as compared with a high GI cereal on measures of accuracy of attention (M=-6.742 and -13.510, respectively, p<0.05) and secondary memory (M=-30.675 and -47.183, respectively, p<0.05).

Attention↗

Inhibitory control test is a simple method to diagnose minimal hepatic encephalopathy and predict development of overt hepatic encephalopathy.

OBJECTIVES: To compare inhibitory control test (ICT), a simple/rapid test of attention, to a standard psychometric battery (SPT) to diagnose minimal hepatic encephalopathy (MHE) and predict development of overt hepatic encephalopathy (OHE) in cirrhotic patients. METHODS: Fifty nonalcoholic cirrhotics and 50 age/educational-status-matched controls were given ICT and SPT in the same sitting. Performance impaired beyond two standard deviations of controls was considered MHE in cirrhotics. ICT results (lure/target response and lures/person) were compared between controls and cirrhotics and within cirrhotics with/without MHE. Receiver-operating characteristic analysis was used to study ICT for MHE diagnosis. Twenty subjects were administered SPT and ICT twice to assess test-retest reliability. All cirrhotics were followed routinely for the development of OHE. RESULTS: Cirrhotics performed worse than controls on SPT and ICT. Using SPT, 39 cirrhotics had MHE. ICT was administered faster than SPT (15 vs 37 min). Cirrhotics with MHE had significantly higher lure (28%vs 3%) and lower target response (91%vs 96%) compared with those without MHE. Lure/person >5 had 90% sensitivity/specificity for MHE diagnosis. AUC for receiver-operating characteristic for lures alone was 95.8%. Lure and target responses were highly correlated (r= 0.9) between sessions showing high test-retest reliability. Five (10%) patients developed OHE on f/u of 26 +/- 10 months; all five had been diagnosed with MHE using ICT and SPT. None of the five patients with discordant results on SPT and ICT developed OHE. CONCLUSIONS: ICT has good sensitivity/specificity for MHE diagnosis, is reliable and is equivalent to SPT for predicting OHE development.

Attention↗