PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 8170636

Kidney volume estimation using 99Tcm-DMSA RSPECT: evaluation by phantom study.

Abstract

Renal parenchymal volume is important for clinical interpretation. The phantom study was carried out to validate the volume calculation. The volume of kidney phantom was determined using reoriented single photon emission computed tomography (RSPECT). The phantom volume range was 20-300 ml. There are two major factors in the determination of volume which are radioactivity concentration and organ/background ratio. Our results showed that the effect of radioactivity concentration on the volume in the kidney phantom is -3.3 to 7.5% whereas the effect of organ/background ration was only 2.2%. Our relative volume deviation, therefore, from the real volume was 1.43%. We concluded that it is feasible to use kidney volume in clinical work.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

V Prais, S Zakko, L Mrhac, Y Parikh. 1994. Kidney volume estimation using 99Tcm-DMSA RSPECT: evaluation by phantom study.. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006231-199402000-00007

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Value of endorectal ultrasonography in the treatment of rectal tumors].

OBJECTIVES: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of endosonography and to appreciate its influence on the therapeutic strategy. METHODS: Sixty-two patients referred to the gastroenterology unit between April 1990 and February 1995 for a rectal tumor. Thirty-two patients did not receive any preoperative treatment (group A) and 30 were treated by radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy before surgery (group B). Transrectal ultrasonography was performed with a Bruel and Kjaer device. RESULTS: Diagnostic accuracy for parietal infiltration was 84% for the entire series, 94% for group A and 73% for group B. Diagnostic accuracy of lymph node invasion was 71% for the entire series, 81% and 60% for groups A and B, respectively. It is highly probable that a histopathologic down-staging due to preoperative treatment explained the results in the group B. Using a pragmatic approach which combined the results for parietal infiltration and for lymph node invasion, transrectal ultrasonography would have correctly selected 20 among the 25 patients who could have been treated by local excision. The use of this same pragmatic approach in patients with high risk of local recurrence enabled correct selection of 26 among the 32 exposed patients. CONCLUSION: We conclude that transrectal ultrasonography: 1. is a reliable technique for the pretherapeutic staging of rectal cancer, especially for the assessment of parietal infiltration. Progress is needed for the diagnosis of lymph node invasion; 2. selects well the patients who can be treated by local excision; 3. is a reliable technique for the selection of patients who need preoperative treatment.

Evaluation Studies as Topic