PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 8245284

Coping modeling problem solving versus mastery modeling: effects on adherence, in-session process, and skill acquisition in a residential parent-training program.

Abstract

This trial compared two approaches used to introduce parenting skills in a residential staff training program. Fifty staff were randomly assigned to: mastery modelling in which videotaped models demonstrated new skills, coping modelling problem solving (CMPS) in which participants formulated their own solutions to the errors depicted by videotaped models, or a waiting-list control group. In both, leaders used modelling, role playing, and homework projects to promote mastery and transfer of new skills. The skills of all groups improved, but CMPS participants attended more sessions, were late to fewer sessions, completed more homework, engaged in more cooperative in-session interaction, rated the program more positively, and reported higher job accomplishment scores. These data suggest that CMPS allowing participants to formulate their own solutions may enhance adherence and reduce the resistance observed in more didactic programs.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

C E Cunningham, J R Davis, R Bremner, K W Dunn, T Rzasa. 1993. Coping modeling problem solving versus mastery modeling: effects on adherence, in-session process, and skill acquisition in a residential parent-training program.. https://doi.org/10.1037/%2F0022-006x.61.5.871

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

When walking fails.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Adaptation, Psychological

Sexual adjustment of patients undergoing gracilis myocutaneous flap vaginal reconstruction in conjunction with pelvic exenteration.

BACKGROUND: Although the technique for gracilis myocutaneous vaginal reconstruction was first described in the mid-1970s and has been used in conjunction with pelvic exenteration since that time, there is little available information regarding sexual adjustment after such a procedure. The purpose of this study was to assess the sexual adjustment of women who underwent pelvic exenteration and gracilis myocutaneous vaginal reconstruction at the study institution. METHODS: In a prospective study design, 95 patients were identified who underwent pelvic exenteration and gracilis myocutaneous vaginal reconstruction at the study institution from 1977 through 1989 and a convenience sample was selected of 44 patients who completed a modified version of the Sexual Adjustment Questionnaire (SAQ) when they returned to the gynecologic oncology outpatient clinic for routine follow-up care. A vaginal assessment was also performed by the attending physician. RESULTS: Twenty-one of 40 patients (52.5%) completing the questionnaire reported not resuming sexual activity after surgery; 19 patients reported sexual activity between 1.5 months to 12 years postoperatively. Of the patients who resumed sexual activity, 84% did so within 1 year of surgery. The most common problems noted by patients in adjusting to sexual activity after surgery were self-consciousness about the urostomy or colostomy and being seen in the nude by their partner, vaginal dryness, and vaginal discharge. The mean rank of preexenteration SAQ scores was 66.4, and the mean rank of postexenteration scores was 48.7 (P < 0.0001), demonstrating that sexual adjustment after exenteration was significantly poorer than before the surgery. On the basis of data gathered from a vaginal assessment form, 31 of 44 patients (70.4%) were judged to have a potentially functional neovagina. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the findings of this questionnaire study, sexual adjustment is often significantly impaired in women after pelvic exenteration and gracilis myocutaneous vaginal reconstruction. Future modifications in surgical technique, more realistic patient counseling and aggressive postoperative support will hopefully minimize such problems.

Adaptation, Psychological