PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 8255580

[Postischemic inverted T waves: does gradual regression indicate improved prognosis?].

Abstract

This study has followed up the natural history of postischemic inverted T waves and assessed the prognosis. 40 consecutive patients with unstable angina with postischemic precordial inverted T waves in the noninfarcted, previously ischemic area were followed during the persistence (negative T wave period) and after resolution of inverted T waves (positive T wave period). The outcome with frequencies of acute myocardial infarction, acute ischemic syndrome, angina pectoris, positive exercise test, silent myocardial ischemia, anterior wall motion abnormalities on echocardiogram, positive coronary arteriography were determined and compared in the negative versus positive T wave periods. Postischemic inverted T waves showed resolution within the postischemic 3-21 days (at a mean of 10.6 days) in 31 patients on medical treatment alone during the whole study period. Frequencies of parameters/patients determined in negative versus positive T wave periods are as follows: acute myocardial infarction: 5/40 versus 0/31 (non significant), acute ischemic syndrome: 25/40 versus 2/31 (p < 0.001), angina pectoris: 32/40 versus 11/31 (p < 0.001), positive treadmill exercise test: 14/16 versus 14/30 (p < 0.02), silent myocardial ischemia: 14/14 versus 16/31 (p < 0.01), hypokinesis 26/34 versus 4/24 (p < 0.001), positive coronary arteriography: 4/4 versus 11/11 (non significant). In most patients on medical treatment, the postischemic inverted T waves tend to resolve within 3 weeks. Attention has to be paid to the patients with postischemic inverted T waves during the negative T wave period: the high ischemic risk gradually decreases with resolution of negative T waves.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

K Simon, T Turi, P Szabó, A Szelier, A Szépvölgyi, M Sereg, L Szatmáry. 1993-12-05. [Postischemic inverted T waves: does gradual regression indicate improved prognosis?].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8255580/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

A quality guarantee in acute coronary syndromes: the American College of Cardiology's Guidelines Applied in Practice program taken real-time.

BACKGROUND: Wide variation exists in the management of acute coronary syndromes (ACSs), which includes an apparent underutilization of evidence-based therapies. We have previously demonstrated that application of the American College of Cardiology Guidelines Applied in Practice (GAP) tools can improve quality indicator rates and outcomes of patients hospitalized with ACS. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a real-time system for monitoring key quality-of-care indicators using GAP would improve both process indicators and outcomes beyond those of the initial implementation of GAP. DESIGN: Prospective patient identification, prospective chart coding, retrospective data abstraction. PATIENTS: All patients with ACS admitted (N = 3189) to our institution between January 1, 1999, and December 2004; 2019 studied before real-time implementation from January 1, 1999, to June 30, 2002, and 1170 studied during real-time implementation from July 1, 2002, to December 31, 2004. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The effect of real-time monitoring of key quality indicators on inhospital therapy and outcomes, and 6-month outcomes in patients admitted with ACS. RESULTS: The real-time GAP implementation correlated with more frequent use of inhospital angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (72.7% vs 63.7%, P < .0001), beta blockers (93.0% vs 89.7%, P = .0016), statins (81.2% vs 65.9%, P < .0001), antiplatelet agents (69.2% vs 22.5%, P < .0001), and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (35.5% vs 26.7%, P < .0001). There were fewer episodes of inhospital congestive heart failure (3.85% vs 8.77%, P < .0001) and major bleeding events (3.2% vs 7.9%, P < .0001) after the real-time system was adopted. Real-time GAP also resulted in higher discharge rates of aspirin (92.1% vs 86.5%, P < .0001), beta blockers (86.8% vs 79.1%, P < .0001), statins (81.2% vs 64.7%, P < .0001), and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (67.1% vs 55.5%, P < .0001). Real-time GAP implementation was associated with fewer rehospitalizations for heart disease (19.8% vs 25.2%, P = .0014), myocardial infarction (3.5% vs 5.4%, P = .0243), and combined death/cerebrovascular accident/myocardial infarction (9.5% vs 13.9%, P = .0009) during the first 6 months after discharge. CONCLUSION: The institution of a formal system to review and "guarantee" key quality-of-care indicators real time in the hospital is associated with improved outcomes in patients admitted with ACS. The combination of American College of Cardiology's GAP program and its real-time implementation leads to higher use of evidence-based therapies and correspondingly better outcomes than those associated with the initial GAP implementation.

Angina, Unstable↗