PubMed · 8263223
Problems in the case for psychotherapeutic integration.
Abstract
The arguments in favor of therapeutic integration are summarized and evaluated. Weaknesses of the position are: (1) the false claim that all therapies are equally effective; (2) the lack of a clear and accurate specification of what makes a school of therapy "legitimate"; (3) the lack of a clear case for an accurate and comprehensive list of common elements across therapies; (4) a lack of clarity concerning "clinical strategy"; (5) the incorrect claim that cognitive therapy provides a useful and neutral meta-language; (6) inadequate evidence of trends toward integration; (7) fallacious reasoning based on these alleged trends; and (8) a misunderstanding of the history and philosophy of science.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
W O'Donohue, M McKelvie. 1993. Problems in the case for psychotherapeutic integration.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7916(93)90045-x
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.