PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 8363031

[Anesthesia simulators and training devices].

Abstract

Simulators and training devices are used extensively by educators in 'high-tech' occupations, especially those requiring an understanding of complex systems and co-ordinated psychomotor skills. Because of advances in computer technology, anaesthetised patients can now be realistically simulated. This paper describes several training devices and a simulator currently being employed in the training of anaesthesia personnel at the University of Florida. This Gainesville Anesthesia Simulator (GAS) comprises a patient mannequin, anaesthesia gas machine, and a full set of normally operating monitoring instruments. The patient can spontaneously breathe, has audible heart and breath sounds, and palpable pulses. The mannequin contains a sophisticated lung model that consumes and eliminates gas according to physiological principles. Interconnected computers controlling the physical signs of the mannequin enable the presentation of a multitude of clinical signs. In addition, the anaesthesia machine, which is functionally intact, has hidden fault activators to challenge the user to correct equipment malfunctions. Concealed sensors monitor the users' actions and responses. A robust data acquisition and control system and a user-friendly scripting language for programming simulation scenarios are key features of GAS and make this system applicable for the training of both the beginning resident and the experienced practitioner. GAS enhances clinical education in anaesthesia by providing a non-threatening environment that fosters learning by doing. Exercises with the simulator are supported by sessions on a number of training devices. These present theoretical and practical interactive courses on the anaesthesia machine and on monitors. An extensive system, for example, introduces the student to the physics and clinical application of transoesophageal echocardiography.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M Hartmannsgruber, M Good, R Carovano, S Lampotang, J S Gravenstein. 1993. [Anesthesia simulators and training devices].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8363031/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Videotape feedback in teaching laryngoscopy.

PURPOSE: To evaluate if videotape feedback provides educational insights for students learning laryngoscopy that they would not otherwise perceive. METHODS: Twenty-six medical students were videotaped while performing laryngoscopy for oral intubation. Before and after reviewing their performance on the videotape, they answered a standardized questionnaire assessing the adequacy of positioning, head movement during laryngoscopy, degrees of neck flexion and head extension, time elapsed, and whether the laryngoscope contacted the upper lip or teeth. After the review, they were asked if being videotaped was distracting, whether it provided new instructional insights and, if so, which was most important. RESULTS: Only 4% of students felt that initial head and neck positioning was suboptimal and this increased to 38% after videotape review (P = 0.029). The perceived inadequacy of positioning seemed related to initial overestimation of head extension (34.0 +/- 15 degrees) compared with that seen on videotape (21.5 +/- 13.5 degrees, P = 0.003). The estimated duration of laryngoscopy was underestimated (55 +/- 32 sec vs. 75 +/- 29 sec, P = .024) before videotape review. Although 26.9% (7/26) of students admitted feeling distracted by the video camera, all felt the experience had educational value. CONCLUSION: Videotape feedback changed students' perception of how they performed laryngoscopy. In particular, head extension was overestimated and duration of laryngoscopy underestimated.

Anesthesiology