PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 8487113

Laser hazards in research laboratories.

Abstract

Laser use is expanding rapidly in laboratories, where multiple use strategies of research are not often amenable to laser engineering safeguards employed in industry. We report on five cases of laser-associated incidents requiring medical follow-up from a single research institution, and present exposure circumstances from four other incidents. Eye injuries from direct and reflected beams resulted from open alignment procedures in the absence of appropriate eye protection. Nd:YAG lasers operated with doubling crystals appear to create a considerable risk. For several reasons, we believe the importance of laser-associated injuries are underestimated and the incidence underreported in the research setting. Although knowledge personnel are shown to suffer lapses in standard operating procedures, most incidents and all injuries involved relatively inexperienced personnel. We propose that research laser users be registered and required to undergo formal training in laser safety. Student researchers are a key target population. Collaborative implementation between the equipment supplier and research user will be required to achieve this widespread implementation of effective training.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

C S Barbanel, A M Ducatman, M J Garston, T Fuller. 1993. Laser hazards in research laboratories.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8487113/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Indicators for occupational health surveillance.

Each year, millions of the estimated 140 million U.S. workers are injured on the job or become ill from exposure to hazards at work. These work-related injuries and illnesses result in substantial human and economic costs for workers, employers, and society; estimated direct and indirect costs of work-related injuries and illnesses are approximately $170 billion annually. In 1998, the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists (CSTE) and CDC's National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) convened a work group that identified priority occupational health conditions to be placed under surveillance, addressed cross-cutting surveillance concerns, and made recommendations regarding the role of states in a comprehensive nationwide surveillance system for work-related disease, injuries, and hazards. CSTE recommendations led to the generation of 19 occupational health indicators (OHIs) and one Employment Demographic Profile, which were developed during 2001-2003. The OHIs complement other guidelines for state-based occupational health surveillance to address overall state and national goals to improve public health. These OHIs are intended to help states build occupational health capacity by providing them with tools to collect and generate important, basic information concerning the occupational health status of the state population and to identify areas in which to focus prevention efforts. In 2005, CSTE released a report compiling OHI data from 13 states. NIOSH provides funding for the OHIs because they are now a required component of state-based cooperative agreements for occupational health surveillance. This report introduces the OHIs and describes CSTE's approach to developing this new occupational health surveillance tool.

Accidents, Occupational↗

[Lies and Latin].

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Accidents, Occupational↗