PubMed · 8493181
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
I Rapin. 1993. Hearing disorders.. https://doi.org/10.1542/pir.14-2-43
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Middle ear effusion has been considered the most common cause of vestibular disturbance in children. However, there have been only a few studies on vestibular disturbance in children with otitis media with effusion. We studied the vestibular systems of 30 children with otitis media with effusion aged 8 to 13 years and compared the results with 15 age- and sex-matched controls. A questionnaire relating to vestibular disturbance was given to patients and their parents. Spontaneous nystagmus and positional nystagmus were recorded by electronystagmography as diagnostic tests of the vestibular system. Romberg's and past-pointing tests were performed on children with otitis media with effusion and controls. After vestibular tests were completed, myringotomy was performed, and a ventilation tube was inserted. The questionnaire and the vestibular tests were repeated after the operation and during the first month after surgery. Our study showed that there was a history of vestibular disturbance in 33% of children with otitis media with effusion. Electronystagmography and Romberg's test findings demonstrated that 33% of the children had vestibular dysfunction (p < 0.05). After myringotomy with ventilation tube insertion, vestibular test results returned to normal, and symptoms related to vestibular disturbance improved. These findings confirm the assumption that middle ear effusion may affect the vestibular system, which can be resolved after myringotomy with ventilation tube insertion.
This study evaluated the accuracy of acoustic response tests in predicting conductive hearing loss in 161 ears of subjects from the age of 2 to 10 yr, using as a "gold standard" the air-bone gap to classify ears as normal or impaired. The acoustic tests included tympanometric peak-compensated static admittance magnitude (SA) and tympanometric gradient at 226 Hz, and admittance-reflectance (YR) measurements from 0.5 to 8 kHz. The performance of individual, frequency-specific, YR test variables as predictors was assessed. By applying logistic regression (LR) and discriminant analysis (DA) techniques to the multivariate YR response, two univariate functions were calculated as the linear combinations of YR variables across frequency that best separated normal and impaired ears. The tympanometric and YR tests were also combined in a multivariate manner to test whether predictive efficacy improved when 226-Hz tympanometry was added to the predictor set. Conductive hearing loss was predicted based on air-bone gap thresholds at 0.5 and 2 kHz, and on a maximum air-bone gap at any octave frequency from 0.5 to 4 kHz. Each air-bone gap threshold ranged from 5 to 30 dB in 5-dB steps. Areas under the relative operating characteristic curve for DA and LR were larger than for reflectance at 2 kHz, SA and Gr. For constant hit rates of 80% and 90%, both DA and LR scores had lower false-alarm rates than tympanometric tests-LR achieved a false-alarm rate of 6% for a sensitivity of 90%. In general, LR outperformed DA as the multivariate technique of choice. In predicting an impairment at 0.5 kHz, the reflectance scores at 0.5 kHz were less accurate predictors than reflectance at 2 and 4 kHz. This supports the hypothesis that the 2-4-kHz range is a particularly sensitive indicator of middle-ear status, in agreement with the spectral composition of the output predictor from the multivariate analyses. When tympanometric and YR tests were combined, the resulting predictor performed slightly better or the same as the predictor calculated from the use of the YR test alone. The main conclusion is that these multivariate acoustic tests of the middle ear, which are analyzed using a clinical decision theory, are effective predictors of conductive hearing loss.
Our objectives were 1) to determine whether transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs) are affected by the status of the tympanic membrane (TM) and middle ear (ME) as determined by clinical examinations and tympanograms; 2) to determine the efficacy of TEOAEs in detecting hearing loss; and 3) to determine the relative effects of the ME status and hearing loss on TEOAEs. In a prospective observational study in a tertiary care children's hospital, 89 patients (169 ears; 9 ears eliminated from analyses) were examined by 2 attending pediatric otolaryngologists for otologic conditions and underwent audiologic evaluations including TEOAEs from August 1994 through May 1995. The main outcome measures were presence or absence of TEOAE whole reproducibility (WR) and reproducibility (R) at 2 kHz. Statistical analyses showed that of the 8 ME and TM conditions evaluated (normal, TM perforation, pressure equalization [PE] tube, TM retraction, tympanosclerosis, TM atrophy, ME effusion, surgery other than PE tube insertion), only the presence of ME effusion and normal examination findings had a significant effect on the results of WR and R at 2 kHz. Of the 6 different types of tympanograms evaluated (A, B, C, AD, As, B with large volume), type A, B, and C tympanograms had a significant effect on WR and types A and B had a significant effect on R at 2 kHz. Hearing losses > or = 25 dB hearing level (HL) at any of the 5 frequencies (0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz) were well predicted by the absence of WR and R at 2 kHz. When clinical examination and impedance data were evaluated simultaneously with hearing status, hearing status had a greater effect on WR and R at 2 kHz. We conclude that type B and C tympanograms and the presence of ME effusion (which reflect abnormal ME status) have an adverse effect on TEOAEs. However, the presence of hearing loss is the most significant predictor of TEOAE results. The TEOAE WR and R at 2 kHz are effective in identifying patients with normal hearing and with hearing losses > or = 25 dB HL.