PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 8770370

Somatic graviception.

Abstract

Psychophysical experiments show that the perception of posture is to a large degree affected by hitherto unknown graviceptors in the human trunk. By remote control subjects move themselves radially along their spinal axis over the horizontal platform of a rotating centrifuge until they feel horizontal. Normal subjects then set the centrifuge axis on average at 22-28 cm caudal of the meatus, neuromectomized subjects at 45-55 cm. Hence the mass centroid of these receptors should be situated near the last ribs. Evaluation of the residual faculties of paraplegic patients lead to the conclusion that somatic graviception is mediated by two distinctly localized inputs, the first entering the spinal cord at the 11th thoracic segment, and the second reaching the brain cranial of the 6th cervical segment, presumably via the N. phrenicus or the N. vagus. The effect of the first named input is abolished after bilateral nephrectomy. This proves that the kidneys affect gravity perception. But whether they function like statoliths or in another way cannot yet be decided. For the second input, however, the results show unequivocally that it yields gravity information through the inertia of a mass in the body. It is hypothesized that this mass may be that of the blood in the large vessels. This is corroborated by the effect of shifting blood craniad by means of positive pressure to the legs. It is inferred that the inertial forces are measured by mechanoreceptors in the structures that mechanically support the large vessels, rather than by baroreceptors.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

H Mittelstaedt. 1996-01-05. Somatic graviception.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-0511(95)05146-5

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Catecholamines in the central nervous system. Overview.

A goal of this part is to examine the functional impact of catecholaminergic systems on CNS function as it relates to normal and pathological states. The participants achieve their objectives individually by relating their high-quality work on this expansive topic, while maintaining a focus on the functional implications of their findings. Nonetheless, despite the necessarily broad nature of the topics presented, there is a remarkable degree of convergence of information. Several subthemes have emerged as a consequence of considering this work in its entirety. First is the importance of examining neurotransmitter effects, not in isolation, but in terms of interactions with other neurotransmitter systems. History has shown that a limited focus often produces confusing or inconsistent results, which become increasingly clear on consideration of the state of the organism. Second is the importance of examining pharmacological and pathophysiological interactions in light of the anatomy of the system and how developmental influences can alter this relationship. Such very general considerations have been found to provide an essential ingredient in understanding the nature of catecholamine function within this complex system.

Afferent Pathways