PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 8923166

Performance improvement with a hybrid FOCUS-PDCA methodology.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In 1995 a team of three members of the quality improvement (QI) department at Hardin Memorial Hospital, Elizabethtown, Kentucky, constructed a unified, simple system of tools and activities drawing on the foundation of FOCUS-PDCA and integrating it with the Joint Commission Improving Organizational Performance (IOP) function and language. METHOD: The team developed documentation tools and educational activities to support each part of the cycle for improving performance: plan--a planning workshop; design--a hybrid FOCUS-PDCA model; measure and assess--a three-part indicator workshop; and measure, assess, and improve--a redesigned QI report form. To document the entire cycle, the team developed an IOP Notebook and a workshop introducing it. Requirements for process design were established based on the standards. Next, the C phase, traditionally interpreted to clarify the current process by flowcharting, was broadened to include internal and external clarification of the process. APPENDIX-USING THE FOCUS--PDCA HYBRID TO REDESIGN AN ANTIBIOGRAM: The hybrid model's hallmark is its flexibility in supporting projects where the need for redesign over improvement is not clear at the outset. In a year-long study in 1995, a "Critter Ridder" Team at Hardin Memorial Hospital used the model to design an innovative antibiogram. In the C phase, customer input was gathered from physicians and a literature search was conducted to identify other antibiogram formats. The team constructed the antibiogram to meet key quality characteristics-accessibility, information, accuracy, timelines, and layout. Documentation on the IOP Notebook templates demonstrates the team's implementation of the performance improvement standards in its design.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J C Gerard, F L Arnold. 1996. Performance improvement with a hybrid FOCUS-PDCA methodology.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1070-3241(16)30273-5

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Probability estimation when some observations are grouped.

This paper considers the use of additional questions for decreasing survey non-response rates and an approach for estimating a probability based on the results obtained. In a survey, the respondents are asked to answer an original question and follow-up questions, where the answers for the follow-up questions are grouped answers for the original question. For example, respondents are asked to provide an exact number of incidents, but in cases of 'Do not know' or 'Refuse' responses, they are subsequently asked to pick an answer from a less specific categorical scale. The new estimator obtains smaller variance asymptotically and does not depend on a distribution family. This method is applied to income questions in a survey regarding injury prevention and behaviours. Another application is survey data on intimate partner violence, where some amendments were applied for incorporating post-stratification weights and for using non-random grouping. For additional illustration, an example of parameter estimation on artificially generated data is presented.

Data Collection↗