PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 9061440

Using a performance improvement team to reinvent a mandatory education program.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To improve employee attendance at Annual Review Day, the day when all mandatory hospitalwide education requirements are presented. The Finley Hospital (Dubuque, Iowa) initiated a performance improvement team in March 1993. Data collected previous to 1993 indicated that the compliance goal of 90% was being met only with difficulty. PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT TEAM: Data indicated three main areas where improvements could be made-communication, enforcement, and curriculum. Recommendations of task forces, with team members as leaders, were implemented. Decisions were made to change Annual Review Day to a full-day format to include all mandatory education, make outcomes competency based, and maintain cost-effectiveness. TRIAL RUN AND EVALUATION: The one-year trial run began in 1994 with gradual changes in the program from a lecture and video format to an interactive game format. For example, at one point a crossword puzzle with information on infection control and bloodborne pathogens was added. The Jeopardy Game format, used to teach the principles of emergency preparedness, was added in June 1994. Full implementation of the curriculum, communication, and enforcement recommendations have resulted in 100% compliance. MAINTAINING THE GAIN: The performance improvement team has continued to monitor results and submit quarterly reports to the quality management department. All participants must complete and pass a competency-based test on the information covered; all 760 participants have passed. The curriculum task force continues to meet on a yearly basis to evaluate the ever-evolving format, analyze attendee evaluations, and consider annual changes to the format.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R Heil, S Lane, D Maahs, J Miner, C Myers, J Roth. 1997. Using a performance improvement team to reinvent a mandatory education program.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1070-3241(16)30303-0

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Teaching development in undergraduate and graduate medical education.

Faculty members from three different institutions, each with long-standing experience teaching development, present strategies for teaching normal development in undergraduate and graduate medical education. This article provides an overview of licensing body requirements, teaching methodology, audiovisual and textbook resources, goals and objectives (knowledge, skills, and attitudes), and sample curricula for teaching human development to medical students, general psychiatry residents, and child and adolescent psychiatry residents. The challenges of teaching development to various groups of trainees with different required course lengths and expected levels of competency, using lifespan and topical approaches, are reviewed.

Accreditation↗

Developing a psychopathology curriculum during child and adolescent psychiatry residency training: general principles and a problem-based approach.

Psychopathology is one of the core elements in a curriculum on child and adolescent psychiatry. Because there is no best-evidence model described for teaching this topic, an approach must be developed in each program that meets the standards set out by the Residency Review Committee and fully prepares its graduates to be competent child and adolescent psychiatrists. Methods used for teaching psychopathology may vary widely among programs and should be based on a sound educational rationale and adult learning principles that emphasize life-long, self-directed learning. This article describes an overall approach to curriculum design and expands on the use of problem-based learning as an educational method for teaching psychopathology in a child and adolescent psychiatry residency program.

Accreditation↗

Teaching evidence-based psychotherapies.

Currently our field is actively involved in developing new ways to characterize and treat children and adolescents with psychiatric disorders and in evaluating the effects of our therapies. We also are beginning to examine the effectiveness of our teaching methods. This article presents evidence for, ideas about, and a philosophy to guide individuals who are privileged to train child psychiatrists in psychotherapies. Specifically, it discusses the issues of the evidence base for diagnosis and for nonspecific and specific active elements of child psychotherapy. Evidence for methods of training is presented. The article addressed the need for supervising psychiatrists to keep abreast of developments in teaching methods so that we can best train competent, curious, and compassionate child psychiatrists.

Accreditation↗