PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 9242855

Sensory processing in the postinstitutionalized child.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine whether children adopted from Romanian orphanages have difficulty with sensory processing and related behaviors. METHOD: Seventy-three children adopted from Romanian orphanages were compared with 72 peers who were typically developing. The subjects' ages ranged from 3 to 6 years. The parent-report Developmental and Sensory Processing Questionnaire was used to assess sensory processing and related behaviors. The tool consists of questions in six sensory processing domains and five related behavioral domains. RESULTS: Multiple t tests indicated that the subjects adopted from Romanian orphanages demonstrated significantly greater problems than those in the control group on five of the six sensory processing domains: touch, movement-avoids, movement-seeks, vision, and audition. Additionally, the Romanian subjects exhibited significantly greater problems than the control subjects on four of the five behavioral domains: activity level, feeding, organization, and social-emotional. CONCLUSIONS: These findings substantiate clinical observations and parent reports of sensory processing deficits in children adopted from Romanian orphanages and highlight the critical importance of the environment for sensory integration. The findings also enhance our understanding of how children who were previously institutionalized respond to the human and physical environment.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

S A Cermak, L A Daunhauer. Sensory processing in the postinstitutionalized child.. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.51.7.500

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Epidemiological methods for studying genes and environmental factors in complex diseases.

Exploration of the human genome presents new challenges and opportunities for epidemiological research. Although the case-control design is quicker and cheaper for study of associations between genotype and risk of disease than the cohort design, cohort studies have been recommended because they can be used to study gene-environment interactions. Although the scientific relevance of statistical interaction is pertinent, the main disadvantage of the case-control design-susceptibility to bias when estimating effects of exposures that are measured retrospectively-does not necessarily apply when studying statistical interaction between genotype and environmental exposure. Because correctly designed genetic association studies are equivalent to randomised comparisons between genotypes, conclusions about cause can be drawn from genetic associations even when the risk ratio is modest. For adequate statistical power to detect such modest risk ratios, the case-control design is more feasible than the cohort design.

Case-Control Studies↗

Hybrid capture-II and LCR-E7 PCR assays for HPV typing in cervical cytologic samples.

As part of an ongoing cohort study in the Hokuriku region of Japan, cervical cell samples from histologically confirmed normal (n = 114) or abnormal (n = 286) women were examined for the presence of HPV DNA using a second-generation hybrid capture assay (HCA-II) and LCR-E7 PCR. HCA-II detected low-risk (HPV-6, -11, -42, 43 and -44) and high-risk (HPV-16, -18, -31, -33, -35, -39, -45, -51, -52, -56, -58, -59 and -68) HPV types, while LCR-E7 PCR detected an additional 7 HPV types and some uncharacterized types. In screening of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSILs) and invasive cervical cancer, the sensitivities of HCA-II and LCR-E7 PCR testing the high-risk HPV types were 83% and 81%, respectively, while the specificity of both assays was 93%. The sensitivity of LCR-E7 PCR increased to 87%, which was significantly higher than that in HCA-II, when testing both high-risk and other HPV types. Sixty-eight inconsistent results (17% of total tested) from HCA-II and LCR-E7 PCR were due to (i) low copy number of HPV genome (false-negative for HCA-II, 5.3% and for LCR-E7 PCR, 1.3%), (ii) infection with HPV types undetectable by HCA-II (4.8%), (iii) multiple HPV infections (5%) or (iv) unknown reasons (0.8%). LCR-E7 PCR revealed that infections with HPV-16, -18, -31, -33, -35, -51, -52, -56, -58 or -67 was a high risk for cancer since these types predominated in HSIL and invasive cervical cancer. Samples showing high relative light units (>20) with a high-risk probe in HCA-II also gave positive results in LCR-E7 PCR and were generally associated with abnormal cervical lesions. Thus, we propose that both HCA-II and LCR-E7 PCR are valuable screening tests for premalignant and malignant cervical lesions.

Case-Control Studies↗