PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 9328694

Focal stenting: does it make sense?

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J M Hodgson. 1997. Focal stenting: does it make sense?. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0304(199710)42%3A2%3C137%3A%3Aaid-ccd8%3E3.0.co%3B2-e

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Evaluation of coronary flow reserve in hypertensive patients by dipyridamole transesophageal doppler echocardiography.

This study evaluates the coronary flow reserve (CFR) in hypertensive patients with and without left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy. CFR was assessed by transesophageal Doppler echocardiography in 15 normal subjects (group I), 21 hypertensive patients without LV hypertrophy (group II), and 27 hypertensive patients with LV hypertrophy (group III). All hypertensive patients were complaining of typical anginal pain and had normal coronary angiograms. The sample volume was placed at the bifurcation of the left main and left anterior descending coronary arteries. Coronary blood flow velocities were evaluated at rest, 2 minutes after dipyridamole infusion, and 2 minutes after intravenous aminophylline. The ratios of dipyridamole to rest peak diastolic and systolic velocities were considered as indexes of CFR. Peak diastolic velocity ratio was significantly lower in group III than in groups I and II (1.6 +/- 0.2, 2.7 +/- 0.4, and 2.1 +/- 0.2, respectively; p <0.05), and it was significantly lower in group II than I (p <0.05). The peak systolic velocity ratio was significantly lower in group III than in groups I and II (1.7 +/- 0.3, 2.8 +/- 0.3, and 2.1 +/- 0.2, respectively; p <0.05), and it was significantly lower in group II than I (p <0.05). The peak diastolic velocity ratio was inversely related to systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and LV mass index (r = -0.48, -0. 51, and -0.37 respectively) in hypertensive patients. It is concluded that CFR is significantly impaired in hypertensive patients, especially those with LV hypertrophy, compared with healthy subjects. The degree of impairment of CFR is related to LV mass index.

Angina Pectoris↗

Do patients with suspected heart failure and preserved left ventricular systolic function suffer from "diastolic heart failure" or from misdiagnosis? A prospective descriptive study.

OBJECTIVES: To characterise the clinical features of patients with suspected heart failure but preserved left ventricular systolic function to determine if they have other potential causes for their symptoms rather than being diagnosed with "diastolic heart failure." DESIGN: Prospective descriptive study. SETTING: Outpatient based direct access echocardiography service. PARTICIPANTS: 159 consecutive patients with suspected heart failure referred by general practitioners. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Symptoms (including shortness of breath, ankle oedema, and paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnoea) and history of coronary heart disease and chronic pulmonary disease. Transthoracic echocardiography, body mass index, pulmonary function tests, and electrocardiography. RESULTS: 109 of 159 participants had suspected heart failure in the absence of left ventricular systolic dysfunction, valvular heart disease, or atrial fibrillation. Of these 109, 40 were either obese or very obese, 54 had a reduction in forced expiratory volume in 1 second to </=70%, and 97 had a peak expiratory flow rate </=70% of normal. Thirty one patients had a history of angina, 12 had had a myocardial infarction, and seven had undergone a coronary artery bypass graft. Only seven patients lacked a recognised explanation for their symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: For most patients with a diagnosis of heart failure but preserved left ventricular systolic function there is an alternative explanation for their symptoms-for example, obesity, lung disease, and myocardial ischaemia-and the diagnosis of diastolic heart failure is rarely needed. These alternative diagnoses should be rigorously sought and managed accordingly.

Angina Pectoris↗

Sexual intercourse and stable angina pectoris.

Stable angina pectoris is a common condition associated with chest pain predictable for a given level of exercise. Sexual intercourse does not lead to exaggerated heart rate or blood pressure responses and is interpreted by the heart as one of many forms of activity that may take place in a 24-hour period. Stable angina patients optimally treated are not at significantly increased cardiovascular risk during sexual intercourse. Erectile dysfunction (ED) increases with age and shares similar cardiovascular risk factors with stable angina. Sildenafil citrate can be safely prescribed for stable patients with ED providing they are not taking oral, topical, or sublingual nitrates. Sexual relationships should not be constrained by the diagnosis of angina pectoris provided appropriate medical advice is given on risk status. Family physicians and specialists are able to provide this advice based on their knowledge of the patient and the social circumstances. Impersonal advice is potentially dangerous and should be vigorously discouraged.

Angina Pectoris↗