PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 9346056

Dog bites: how big a problem?

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the magnitude of the dog bite problem in the US. METHODS: Data on dog bites were gathered as part of a 1994 national telephone survey of 5,238 randomly dialed households. Data were weighted to provide national estimates. RESULTS: The weighted total number of dog bites was 4,494,083 (estimated incidence = 18/1,000 population); of these, 756,701 persons sustained bites necessitating medical attention (incidence rate = 3/1,000). Children had 3.2 times higher medically attended bite rates than adults (6.4/1,000 children v 2/1,000 adults). CONCLUSIONS: More attention and research needs to be devoted to the prevention of dog bites. Potential prevention strategies include: educational programs on canine behavior, especially directed at children; laws for regulating dangerous or vicious dogs; enhanced animal control programs; and educational programs regarding responsible dog ownership and training. Unfortunately, the relative or absolute effectiveness of any of these strategies has not been assessed. Continuing surveillance for dog bites will be needed if we are to better understand how to reduce the incidence of dog bites and evaluate prevention efforts.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J J Sacks, M Kresnow, B Houston. 1996. Dog bites: how big a problem?. https://doi.org/10.1136/ip.2.1.52

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

SAFETYNET--a European network for process safety.

SAFETYNET is a European Thematic Network on Process Safety funded under the Brite-Euram Programme. The aim of this network is to reduce the time delay between research results and their practical use in industry in order to stimulate further development and adoption of technologies in the field of process safety. This is mainly done in areas related both to the safe operation of process plants and production facilities and to the prevention of accidents.

Accident Prevention↗

SCAP: a new methodology for safety management based on feedback from credible accident-probabilistic fault tree analysis system.

As it is conventionally done, strategies for incorporating accident--prevention measures in any hazardous chemical process industry are developed on the basis of input from risk assessment. However, the two steps-- risk assessment and hazard reduction (or safety) measures--are not linked interactively in the existing methodologies. This prevents a quantitative assessment of the impacts of safety measures on risk control. We have made an attempt to develop a methodology in which risk assessment steps are interactively linked with implementation of safety measures. The resultant system tells us the extent of reduction of risk by each successive safety measure. It also tells based on sophisticated maximum credible accident analysis (MCAA) and probabilistic fault tree analysis (PFTA) whether a given unit can ever be made 'safe'. The application of the methodology has been illustrated with a case study.

Accident Prevention↗