PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 9451778

Disposal options and case-study pathway analyses.

C J Roberts·J B Quinby·W P Duggan·Y Yuan
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

This paper presents an overview of alternatives that currently are employed for the disposal of wastes containing enhanced concentrations of naturally occurring radioactive materials (NORM). The application of pathway assessment methodology to the derivation of acceptable cleanup criteria for residual NORM is described. A specific example is provided drawing on experience with a site containing above-background levels of natural uranium-series and thorium-series nuclides. The options for safe, permanent disposal of U and Th bearing NORM waste are discussed and the application of pathway analysis to performance assessment of a typical engineered disposal cell is illustrated. Typical methods for disposal of other NORM waste forms also are described. This includes radium-contaminated wastes from petroleum sludges, uranium milling, and geothermal power plant operation as well as thorium wastes from production of thorium-magnesium alloys.

Explore related subjects

Background RadiationEnvironmental ExposureFacility Design and ConstructionHumansIndustryMiningModels, TheoreticalRadioactive WasteRadioisotopesRadiumRefuse DisposalThoriumUraniumJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

C J Roberts, J B Quinby, W P Duggan, Y Yuan. 1998. Disposal options and case-study pathway analyses.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0969-8043(97)00245-5

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2000

Radiation-induced genomic instability: a paradigm-breaking phenomenon and its relevance to environmentally induced cancer.

The existing paradigm governing radiobiology which is fundamental to the estimation of environmental radiation risk, cannot explain the phenomena of radiation induced genomic instability and the bystander effect. Both effects can, however, be understood in terms of the dynamical genome concept, qualitatively described herein. The dynamical genome concept may find further application in better understanding other aspects of biology, most notably the cancer process in general and the consequences of genetic modification.

Background Radiation↗
PubMed2000

Concentrations and consequent radiation doses of uranium-238, thorium-232 and potassium-40 contained in the front glass of CRTs.

Concentrations of 238U, 232Th, and 40K contained in the front glass of CRTs (cathode ray tube) of three television sets are measured by gamma-ray spectrometry on the assumption of radioactive equilibrium in uranium and thorium series. The concentrations of 238U and 232Th are also measured by neutron activation analysis. The obtained results by the two different methods agree well within experimental uncertainty, showing that the radioactive equilibrium is found to be established in the present samples, and that the concentrations of 238U and 232Th in the glass can be measured by the gamma-ray spectrometry as well as by the neutron activation analysis. We also found that although the obtained concentrations of 238U (6.5-13.5 ppm in weight) and 232Th (8.4-15.1 ppm) vary considerably between these three kinds of CRTs, those of 40K (average: 7.45 +/- 0.05 ppm) are almost equal for all samples. Moreover, the radiation dose rates are estimated for gamma-rays from the CRT. At distances larger than 30 cm from the surface of the front glass, even the dose rate (5.65 x 10(-3) microSv/h) for the CRT containing the highest concentration of 238U and 232Th is smaller than one-tenth of that (7 x 10(-2) microSv/h) for background radiation, and that is practically negligible.

Background Radiation↗
PubMed2000

The 1999 Lauriston S. Taylor lecture--back to background: natural radiation and radioactivity exposed.

I am profoundly grateful for being chosen as the twenty-third presenter of the Lauriston S. Taylor Lecture, and I share this honor with a list of distinguished scientists, including my husband, who pay tribute to the premier leader in radiation protection. In 1938, Laurie was working for the National Bureau of Standards and chaired the Advisory Committee on X-ray and Radium Protection, a group of 8 persons, who set the pace for all forthcoming radiation standards. NBS had, since 1913, been standardizing essentially all of the radium offered for sale in the U.S., and the problem arose to revise the handbook on proper conditions for handling radium based on the then current knowledge. This resulted in Handbook 23 (1938) superseding the 1934 work. At the time Laurie was a scientist working in the measurements side of radiation and though he contributed much to that field, his name is inseparably linked with guidance in radiation protection. Today we pay tribute for his leadership that he carried out with intelligence, grace, and personal warmth. My talk today deals mostly with measured data for naturally occurring internal radiation emitters and how these data can be used for predictive purposes in estimating the dose and risk from internal body contamination. This stresses the "and Measurements" part of the Council's title. The topic of this year's NCRP Annual Meeting is "Radiation Protection in Medicine: Contemporary Issues." I believe that physicians and State and Federal agencies will have to cope with complaints following various exposure situations resulting from the cleanup of background radionuclides during closure at nuclear facilities, military use of radioactivity, and occurrences of high natural background in some locations. They will find comfort in the knowledge that existing background radiation data can be the basis for predictions of realistic dose and risk in most situations.

Background Radiation↗