PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 9534712

X-ray tubes--continuous innovative technology.

Abstract

The X-ray tube is one of the most important components in any X-ray system. In the beginning, physicists and physicians used gas ion tubes. The so-called Coolidge tube applied a high vacuum and is still used today. Medical examinations have required continuously improved designs of X-ray tubes (smaller focal spots at a higher output). The principle of the Goetze line focus is still applied in any diagnostic X-ray tube. Different anode materials and the rotating anode contributed to an increased output and reduced exposure time. Bearings needed special attention. Spiral groove bearings are the most advanced design today. The heat storage capacity of the anode and the tube housing assembly influences examination time and patient throughput. Cardiac imaging required less motion blurring in cine film images and increasing radiation exposure in interventional procedures called for measures to reduce dose. Protection against radiation and electric shock has always been a concern of design engineers. Focal spot sizes dedicated to specific applications and heat management within the total tube housing assembly will be future issues. Even with the event of ultrasound and MR technology, X-ray procedures will still be applied for diagnostic and interventional purposes.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

E Ammann, W Kutschera. 1997. X-ray tubes--continuous innovative technology.. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.1997.0002

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Clinical potential of intravascular ultrasound for physiological assessment of coronary stenosis: relationship between quantitative ultrasound tomography and pressure-derived fractional flow reserve.

BACKGROUND: Little is known regarding intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) criteria to determine the functional severity of coronary stenosis. Recently, fractional flow reserve (FFR) has emerged as a lesion-specific index of the functional severity of a coronary stenosis that is independent of systemic hemodynamic variability. The present study was undertaken to determine the IVUS parameters for the physiological severity of coronary stenosis. METHODS AND RESULTS: Fifty-one lesions in 42 patients were evaluated by means of quantitative coronary angiogram, IVUS, and intracoronary pressure measurements. The FFR was calculated as the ratio of the distal coronary pressure divided by the proximal coronary pressure under hyperemia. We considered a value of the FFR <0.75 as significant in determining inducible ischemia, according to the previous studies. The minimal luminal area (MLA) and the area stenosis were measured by IVUS. By regression analysis, the MLA showed a positive correlation with the FFR value (r(2)=0.62, P<0.0001). The area stenosis had a significant inverse correlation with the value of FFR (r(2)=0.60, P<0.0001). The IVUS thresholds that maximized the sensitivity and specificity were MLA <3.0 mm(2) (sensitivity, 83.0%; specificity, 92.3%) and area stenosis >0.6 (sensitivity, 92.0%; specificity, 88.5%). The combination of both criteria (MLA <3.0 mm(2) and area stenosis <0.6) without exception met a value of the FFR <0.75. CONCLUSIONS: Anatomic parameters obtained by IVUS showed a significant correlation to the FFR values. The present study demonstrated that the combination of the MLA and area stenosis measured by IVUS can be an anatomic predictor for the physiological impact of coronary epicardial stenosis.

Coronary Angiography

Usefulness of three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiographic imaging for evaluating narrowing in the coronary arteries.

Coronary artery (CA) imaging has relied on invasive techniques for diagnosing stenotic lesions. Two-dimensional techniques are limited in obtaining optimal longitudinal views of all segments of the CA because of their spatial orientations. Three-dimensional echocardiography (3DE) may produce any desired cross-sectional views and reconstruct 3-dimensional images from a volumetric data set. Its role in CA imaging has not been fully explored. The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential of 3DE in visualizing CAs and in assessing the severity of stenosis. We performed transesophageal 3DE in 46 patients. Images were collected sequentially with the transducer rotated through 180 degrees. From the 3DE data sets of all 46 patients, cross-sectional views and 3-dimensional images of CAs were reconstructed. For segment-by-segment comparison between CA angiography and 3DE in semiquantitative analysis of coronary stenosis, 5 segments were defined for the proximal CA tree in 20 patients who underwent both procedures. The left main, anterior descending, circumflex, and right CAs were visualized from 3DE in 100%, 100%, 98%, and 72%. The available lengths of these segments from 3DE were 12+/-4 mm (range 4 to 22), 15+/-6 mm (range 6 to 36), 30+/-12 mm (range 13 to 60), and 18+/-9 mm (range 6 to 36), respectively. Comparison between 3DE and CA angiography in semiquantitative estimation of CA stenosis resulted in complete agreement in 83% of the segments (kappa value = 0.7). The sensitivity and specificity of 3DE in detecting significant stenosis (> or =50%) were 84% and 97%. In conclusion, transesophageal 3DE allows imaging of the proximal CA, detection of stenotic lesions, and estimation of the severity of stenosis.

Coronary Angiography