PubMed · 9609312
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
E C Benzel. 1998. Artificial cervical joint.. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1998.88.6.1121
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
STUDY DESIGN: Thoracic pedicle screws were stimulated electrically while recording electromyography (EMG) activity in associated muscle groups intraoperatively. Screw position was then evaluated after surgery using computed tomography (CT). The CT results were compared with evoked EMG threshold values. OBJECTIVE: To report our experience with pedicle screw stimulation in thoracic vertebrae in 22 patients who underwent thoracic level spinal instrumentation from May 1999 to March 2001. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Pedicle screw stimulation for intraoperative assessment of screw placement has been reported in lumbosacral spinal procedures. Evoked EMG thresholds >10 or 11 mA are associated with increased probability of vertebral cortex violation and postoperative complications. Thresholds >15 mA provide a 98% confidence of accurate screw positioning on postoperative CT scans. METHODS: Evoked EMG activity was recorded from ulnar carpal flexors, intercostals, or abdominal muscle groups, depending on the level of screw placement. Postoperative CT scans were read by a staff orthopedic spine surgeon, a senior resident in orthopedics, and a musculoskeletal radiologist. RESULTS: Results of 87 screws are reported. Five screws (5.7%) showed penetration on postoperative CT scans. Six screws (6.9%) had stimulation thresholds < or =11 mA, of which three showed cortical breakthrough. Of the 81 screws with thresholds >11 mA, 79 (97.5%) were within the vertebra. No postoperative neurologic complications were noted in any of the 22 patients. CONCLUSION: These results are consistent with previous studies of lumbosacral pedicle screws. In this series, stimulation thresholds >11 mA have a 97.5% negative predictive value, suggesting that cortical violation is highly unlikely. Although judgment of screw placement should not depend solely on stimulation thresholds, pedicle screw stimulation may provide rapid and useful intraoperative information on screw placement during procedures involving the use of thoracic pedicle screws.
STUDY DESIGN: The location of pedicle screws in relation to adjacent superior segment facet joints in 106 patients after lumbar spinal fusion was assessed using computed tomography and plain radiographs. OBJECTIVES: To document the incidence of adjacent superior segment facet joint violation following transpedicular instrumentation in the lumbar spine. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Review of the literature failed to show any documented study examining this incidence. METHODS: A total of 106 patients (212 top-level facet screws) undergoing lumbar spinal fusion surgery using transpedicular instrumentation between 1996 and 1999 were prospectively evaluated with a computed tomography scan and plain radiographs at 6 months following surgery. These were blindly and independently evaluated by a consultant radiologist and a spinal research fellow to document the incidence of superior segment facet joint violation. Calculation of the kappa coefficient and chi2 analysis were carried out. RESULTS: The spinal research fellow noted the incidence of facet joint violation on the computed tomography scan to be present in 20% of the screws and 32% of the patients, whereas the consultant radiologist noted this to be the case in 23% and 35%, respectively. The kappa coefficient for computed tomography scan was 0.88, whereas for the plain radiographs it was 0.39. The incidence of facet joint violation was noted to be independent of the sex, level, and diagnosis. There was also an almost uniform incidence in each of the years from 1996 to 1999. CONCLUSION: Facet joint violation occurred in just >30% of the patients and 20% of the screws in this study. This, therefore, raises the theoretical possibility of long-term deterioration in the clinical results following the use of transpedicular instrumentation.
We report on our experiences with the use of intraoperative CT imaging in surgery of the thoracic spine and on our results of pedicle screw insertion using spinal navigation and implantable fiducial markers. For our operations we used the Tomoscan M-EG and the EasyGuideSpine (Philips Medical Systems). During the operation the patient was positioned on the mobile CT table. Following dorsal preparation, small titanium screws were implanted in the vertebrae so as to serve as fiducial markers. Image data were obtained by performing a spiral CT scan. Ventilation was suspended for the duration of the CT scan. Screw insertion as well as vertebral biopsies were performed using spinal navigation. Intraoperative CT scans were obtained to confirm the position of the implants and to assess the amount of bony decompression as well as the realignment. Since 1998, 112 patients with various disorders of the thoracic spine have been operated on using the described technique. 365 screws were inserted in the area of T1 to T12. There were 23 (6.3%) misplacements of pedicle screws. In 42 cases (11.5%) we observed a minimal lateral perforation (<2 mm) of the pedicle wall. No neurological, cardiovascular, or pulmonary injury occurred. Intraoperative CT imaging influenced surgical decisions as well as the final result of surgery. Despite the use of intraoperative imaging and accurate spinal navigation, pedicle screw placement in the thoracic spine remains extremely challenging.