Do implant surfaces make a difference?

R M Meffert

Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 9655029

Do implant surfaces make a difference?

R M Meffert

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The synthetic biomaterials commonly used as an interface or surface for soft- and hard-tissue attachment and integration are commercially pure titanium, titanium alloy (usually Ti6A14V), and hydroxyapatite. This review attempts to address the following questions: Do the epithelium and connective tissue attach or adapt to these synthetic surfaces? Is there a seal or just a cuff in terms of the soft-tissue interface? Is hydroxyapatite, commercially pure titanium, or Ti6A14V more predictable and retentive? Is one better than the other or are all the same? Is there an advantage of one surface over the other in terms of bone-to-implant contact or shear strength when stressed? How about bone density and fixture length; is one surface better than any other?

Explore related subjects

Alloys Animals Dental Alloys Dental Implants Dental Prosthesis Design Dental Restoration Failure Durapatite Humans Osseointegration Outcome Assessment, Health Care Surface Properties Titanium Comparative Study Journal Article Review

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

R M Meffert. 1997. Do implant surfaces make a difference?. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9655029/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed1999

Fatigue-crack propagation in Nitinol, a shape-memory and superelastic endovascular stent material.

Improving the design and performance of medical stents for implantation in the human body is of current interest. This paper describes a study of fatigue-crack propagation behavior in the superelastic alloy Nitinol. Specifically, the objective of this work was to study the effect of environment on cyclic crack-growth resistance in an approximately 50Ni-50Ti (atom %) alloy and to provide the necessary data for the safe life prediction of Nitinol endovascular stents. The material selected for this study was heat treated such that it was superelastic at human body temperature; this was confirmed with monotonic uniaxial tensile tests. Characterization of fatigue-crack growth rates was performed at 37 degrees C on disk-shaped compact-tension samples in environments of air, aerated deionized water, and aerated Hank's solution (a simulated body fluid). The effect of cyclic loading on the uniaxial constitutive behavior was investigated at a strain range of 6.4%, and results indicate that the magnitude of available superelastic strain ( approximately 5.0%) is maintained even after cyclic softening. However, despite the persistence of nucleating the stress-induced martensitic phase after cycling with a maximum strain slightly below the plastic yield point, Nitinol was found to have the lowest fatigue-crack growth resistance of the principal metallic alloys currently used for implant applications.

Alloys↗

PubMed1999

Glass-based coatings for titanium implant alloys.

Glass coatings on Ti6Al4V were prepared using a simple enameling technique. The composition of the glasses was tailored to match the thermal expansion of Ti6Al4V. By controlling the firing atmosphere, time, and temperature, it was possible to control the reactivity between the glass and the alloy and to fabricate coatings (25-150 micron thick) with excellent adhesion to the substrate. The optimum firing temperatures ranged between 800 and 840 degrees C at times up to 1 min in air or 15 min in N2. The same basic technique was used to prepare multilayered coatings with graded composition or with hydroxyapatite (HA) particles embedded in the outer layer. Some of these coatings presented excellent adhesion to the substrate and were able to form HA during in vitro tests in simulated body fluid.

Alloys↗

PubMed1999

Hydroxyapatite thin films deposited onto uncoated and (Ti,Al, V)N-coated Ti alloys.

Plasma-sputtered hydroxyapatite (HA) thin coatings ( approximately 1 microm) were deposited onto uncoated and (TiAlV)N-coated Ti-6Al-4V-alloy substrates at low temperatures. The (TiAlV)N coating interlayer was deposited by reactive sputtering. Depositions were achieved by utilizing unbalanced and balanced magnetrons in a capacitively coupled RF plasma. Characterization of the thermostability, bioerosion resistance, and chemical composition of the coating layer was examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy-dispersive X-ray analysis (EDX), and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). The results show that for deposition temperatures as low as 67 degrees C, the crystalline phase of the HA coating still is clearly detectable and that the underlying (TiAlV)N coating can increase the crystallinity and thermostability of the HA coating before and after heat treatment. The thin ( approximately 1 microm) sputtered HA coating shows strong HA characteristic peaks in the FTIR spectra even after a 30-day dissolution test. The experimental results show that a multilayer structure comprised of a bioinert (TiAlV)N and bioactive HA coating has the potential to improve the biocompatibility of implant materials. The bioinert (TiAlV)N coating also may provide a long-term stable interface between bone tissue and an alloy implant after the bioactive HA coating is remodeled by the surrounding tissue.

Alloys↗