PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 9673321

Audiologic assessment and amplification.

Abstract

The basic audiologic tests (audiogram, speech recognition, and acoustic-immittance), special audiologic tests (otoacoustic emissions and auditory-evoked potentials), and screening protocols, including universal hearing screening, are discussed. Hearing and acoustic-immittance screeners are evaluated. This article also reviews advances in hearing and sensory aids and assistive-listening devices.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

C A Silverman. 1998. Audiologic assessment and amplification.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0095-4543(15)30003-8

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Activation of medial olivocochlear efferent system in humans: influence of stimulus bandwidth.

The activity of the medial olivocochlear bundle (MOCB) can be studied in humans through variations in the level of evoked otoacoustic emissions (EOAEs) elicited by contralateral acoustic stimuli (CAS). The present study sought to investigate how the activity of the MOC system at a given frequency, as measured through the contralateral suppression of tone-pip EOAEs, depends on the bandwidth of the contralateral stimulus. EOAEs were recorded in 155 normal-hearing subjects, successively with and without contralateral stimuli whose bandwidth, center frequency and level were systematically varied. We showed a clear dependence of contralateral EOAE suppression on bandwidth demonstrating increased suppression with increased bandwidth over about two octaves around the center frequency of the noise. This effect was obtained irrespective of whether contralateral noise energy was kept constant independently of bandwidth or not, which indicates a role of bandwidth per se in contralateral EOAE suppression. Results are interpreted in terms of a simple model of MOCB activation mechanisms including peripheral bandpass filtering, within-channel compression and across-channel spatial summation by the afferent paths. Complementary experiments suggested a greater effectiveness of increases in bandwidth on the upper than on the lower side and of frequency components akin to or remote from the test frequency than of intermediate bands. Finally, these results were complemented by detailed spectrum analyses of the EOAE level variations induced by the different noises, which revealed that whilst noise components close to or remote from the center frequency generally attenuated EOAE level, intermediate components could in some cases lead to a relative increase in EOAE level. These results can further be explained by assuming different positive and negative weights on the inputs to the spatial summation process depending on their position relative to the center frequency.

Acoustic Impedance Tests

Middle ear influence on otoacoustic emissions. I: noninvasive investigation of the human transmission apparatus and comparison with model results.

Evoked otoacoustic emissions (EOAEs) are generated within the cochlea in response to external sounds, and they can be acoustically detected in the external auditory meatus after backward propagation through the middle ear. In addition to being used to probe the cochlear mechanisms, they are expected to be sensitive to minute changes in middle ear impedance. Systematic measurements of the changes in the vectorial components of EOAEs were carried out after various manipulations of the human middle ear in order to characterize the influence of stiffness and inertia of the stapes and tympanic-membrane systems. For this purpose, stapedius muscle contractions were elicited by high-level contralateral sound, controlled changes in middle ear pressure (range +/-100 daPa) were produced and the tympanic membrane was loaded with water droplets. A computer model of the middle ear network was implemented using a standard lumped-element electric analog of the middle ear (Zwislocki's model). Forward and backward transmission changes were simulated and model predictions were compared to experimental data. Apart from the case of positive middle ear pressures, a close qualitative correspondence was found between model and real-ear results. Each of the effects was characterized by a unique pattern of phase and magnitude changes as a function of frequency, in relation to the mechanical characteristics of the involved subsystem (i.e. stapes stiffness, tympanic-membrane stiffness or mass) and its resonance properties. Owing to their high sensitivity, EOAEs could be helpful for an accurate individual multifrequency analysis of middle ear impedance by comparisons under rest and test conditions.

Acoustic Impedance Tests