PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 9727479

Experiments using animals.

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M Cramer. 1998. Experiments using animals.. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199809030-00069

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

ECVAM's in-house prevalidation/validation studies in the areas of haematotoxicity, reproductive toxicity, metabolism-mediated toxicity and epithelial barrier function.

The European Centre for the Validation of Alternative Methods (ECVAM) facilitates, co-ordinates and participates in validation activities at the European Union level. Various experimental studies, e.g. in the areas of haematotoxicity, reproductive toxicity, nephrotoxicity and epithelial barrier function, and metabolism-mediated toxicity, are underway in ECVAM's laboratories. ECVAM itself is currently involved in the prevalidation/validation of two assays, the colony-forming unit granulocyte/macrophage (CFU-GM) assays for predicting acute neutropenia and the embryonic stem cell test for predicting embryotoxicity. In the areas of metabolism-mediated toxicity and nephrotoxicity and epithelial barrier function, several assays are in the course of development. In many cases, the recommendations of various ECVAM workshops are being followed.

Animal Testing Alternatives↗

Interferon-gamma-primed monocytoid cell lines: optimizing their use for in vitro detection of bacterial pyrogens.

In order to reduce animal testing for quality control of pharmaceutical agents intended for parenteral use, the Limulus amebocyte lysate (LAL) assay is now being accepted in many cases as an alternative to measuring pyrogenic activity of samples in rabbits. However, since the LAL test is specific for cell wall components from Gram-negative bacteria and is sometimes difficult to perform in samples containing large amounts of protein, this alternative still leaves a considerable diagnostic gap. Here, we have optimized a previously established test based on assessing the formation of neopterin or nitrite in interferon-gamma-treated human (THP-1) or murine (J774A.1, RAW264.7) monocytoid cell lines, respectively, in response to bacterial pyrogens. Optimal results were obtained either with THP-1 cells in serum-containing media and using a high concentration of interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) or with RAW264.7 cells in serum-free media and independent of the IFN-gamma dose. Results were significantly correlated with those obtained by another cell-culture-based assay in which formation of tumor necrosis factor-alpha by THP-1 1G3 cells was assessed. Also in RAW264.7 murine monocytoid cells, formation of nitrite and of tumor necrosis factor-alpha in response to a variety of samples was correlated. Samples shown to be pyrogenic in rabbits in a previous study were unambiguously detected with the test presented here. As expected, the LAL test was negative with cell-free supernatants from Staphylococcus aureus66 kDa). Taken together, these results indicate that the use of monocytoid cell lines and the detection of metabolites which are triggered in the course of immunostimulation could fill the gap left by the LAL test and help to further reduce animal testing for pyrogens.

Animal Testing Alternatives↗

The Pertussis Serological Potency Test. Collaborative study to evaluatereplacement of the Mouse Protection Test.

The Pertussis Serological Potency Test (PSPT)--based on in vitro assessment of the humoral immune response against Bordetella pertussis--was developed as an alternative for the Mouse Protection Test (MPT). A small-scale collaborative study was carried out in five laboratories to evaluate the relevance and reliability of the PSPT. The study has been divided into three separate phases, each with its own objective. A pilot-phase study of the antibody detection assay, the 18323-whole cell ELISA (WCE), was included for training purposes. Significant differences in absorbance and antibody concentrations between the laboratories were found. In the Phase I study, the intra-assay, inter-assay and inter-laboratory precisions of the 18323-WCE were assessed. Although a precision of less than 20% was not always established and significant differences in antibody concentrations were found at random throughout the Phase I study, the ranking of the antibody concentrations corresponded well between the laboratories and should warrant a reliable potency estimation of whole cell vaccines (WCV's) in the PSPT. Phase II was a comparative study of the PSPT and the MPT to evaluate the implementation of the PSPT, to demonstrate correlation and to compare the reproducibility and reliability of both tests. The mean antibody concentrations per vaccine dose in the PSPT and the survival of mice in the MPT differed significantly within and between the laboratories. Nevertheless, the potencies of the vaccines under test estimated in both test models did not differ significantly (P>0.05). The PSPT and MPT correlated well in chi2-test of homogeneity within and between the laboratories. The potencies were similar (overall ratio=0.877), but the PSPT is more reproducible and reduces the chance of re-testing due to the smaller 95% confidence intervals. We have demonstrated that the PSPT is a valid model to estimate the potencies of pertussis WCV's from different manufacturers. Moreover, the 18323-WCE is easy to carry out and the intra-assay precision and antibody ranking warrants a reliable potency testing of pertussis WCV's in the PSPT.

Animal Testing Alternatives↗