Parent and general practitioner preferences for infant immunisation. Reactogenicity or multiple injections?

Abstract

AIM: To explore the relative importance parents and general practitioners place on less reactogenic vaccines and multiple injections at each childhood immunisation encounter. METHOD: A random sample of western Sydney parents (n = 162) and GPs (n = 154) completed telephone questionnaires about their preference for either a single injection of pentavalent vaccine (whole-cell pertussis/diphtheria/tetanus/Hib/hepatitis B), or regimen containing the less reactogenic acellular pertussis vaccine requiring two separate injections (acellular pertussis/diphtheria/tetanus and Hib or three separate injections (acellular pertussis/diphtheria/tetanus and Hib and hepatitis B). Potential confounders were examined by univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Regimens containing acellular pertussis vaccine (2 injections or 3 injections) were preferred by 72% and 58% of parents respectively. Those whose children were already vaccinated were less concerned about side effects and were twice (or = 2.0, 95% CI 1.0-4.0) as likely to select the pentavalent (single injection) option. 69% and 77% of GPs preferred the pentavalent rather than the two or three injection acellular option, although previous experience with a systemic adverse reaction to immunisation increased their preference for the acellular pertussis vaccine (or = 2.9, 95% CI 1.1-7.6). Only 54% of parents and 28% of GPs favoured three injections at one visit. CONCLUSION: Parent and GP concerns regarding reactogenicity and multiple injections differ. Parents are more concerned about vaccine reactogenicity than multiple injections. However, if the GP recommends a particular regimen, it is likely to be accepted by parents.