PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Particle Accelerators”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,783 records · Page 99Linked to original sources

Differential effect of the loop diuretic furosemide on short latency auditory and vestibular-evoked potentials.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the differential effect of the loop diuretic furosemide on the auditory and vestibular (otolith) end organs in the same animals simultaneously. DESIGN AND METHODS: Auditory nerve-brain stem-evoked responses (ABR-generated in the cochlea) and short latency vestibular-evoked responses to linear acceleration impulses (L-VsEP-generated in the otolith organs) were recorded from albino Sabra rats both before and at minute intervals after intravenous injections of the loop diuretic furosemide. In some animals, an equal volume of saline was injected to control for the effect of the injection itself. In most animals, more than one injection of saline or furosemide was possible (furosemide, N = 17 injections in 10 rats; saline, N = 18 injections in 9 rats). Peak-to-peak amplitude and peak latency changes in the first wave in each recording (representing end-organ activity) as a function of postinjection time were compared between the two evoked potentials using analysis of variance and repeated t-tests. RESULTS: Saline injections caused only minor changes in the amplitude of the ABR and the L-VsEP. After administration of furosemide, the amplitude of the L-VsEP hardly changed. However, there was a noticeable decrease in the amplitude of the ABR. CONCLUSIONS: Although furosemide has a major depressant effect on cochlear function, vestibular end-organ activity is hardly altered.

Analysis of Variance↗

Stereotactic high dose fraction radiation therapy of extracranial tumors using an accelerator. Clinical experience of the first thirty-one patients.

A stereotactic body frame with a fixation device has been developed for stereotactic radiation therapy of extracranial targets, a precision localization and positioning system in analogy with the stereotactic head frames used for intracranial targets. Results of the first 42 treated tumors in 31 patients are presented. Most of the patients had solitary tumors in liver, lung or retroperitoneal space. Clinical target volumes ranged from 2 to 622 cm3 (mean 78 cm3) and minimum doses to the planning target volumes (PTV) of 7.7-30 Gy/fraction (mean 14.2 Gy) were given on 1-4 occasions to a total minimum dose to the PTVs of 7.7-45 Gy (mean 30.2 Gy) to the periphery of the PTV and total mean doses to the PTVs of 8-66 Gy (mean 41 Gy). The central part of the tumor was usually given about 50% higher dose compared to that of the periphery of the PTV by a planned inhomogeneous dose distribution. Some of the patients received stereotactic radiation therapy concomitantly to more than one target, in others new metastases were also treated which appeared during the follow-up period. We observed a local rate of no progressive disease of 80% during a follow-up period of 1.5-38 months. Fifty percent of the tumors decreased in size or disappeared.

Aged↗

Monte Carlo simulation of electron beams from an accelerator head using PENELOPE.

The Monte Carlo code PENELOPE has been used to simulate electron beams from a Siemens Mevatron KDS linac with nominal energies of 6, 12 and 18 MeV. Owing to its accuracy, which stems from that of the underlying physical interaction models, PENELOPE is suitable for simulating problems of interest to the medical physics community. It includes a geometry package that allows the definition of complex quadric geometries, such as those of irradiation instruments, in a straightforward manner. Dose distributions in water simulated with PENELOPE agree well with experimental measurements using a silicon detector and a monitoring ionization chamber. Insertion of a lead slab in the incident beam at the surface of the water phantom produces sharp variations in the dose distributions, which are correctly reproduced by the simulation code. Results from PENELOPE are also compared with those of equivalent simulations with the EGS4-based user codes BEAM and DOSXYZ. Angular and energy distributions of electrons and photons in the phase-space plane (at the downstream end of the applicator) obtained from both simulation codes are similar, although significant differences do appear in some cases. These differences, however, are shown to have a negligible effect on the calculated dose distributions. Various practical aspects of the simulations, such as the calculation of statistical uncertainties and the effect of the 'latent' variance in the phase-space file, are discussed in detail.

Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation↗

Tissue compensation using dynamic collimation on a linear accelerator.

PURPOSE: The availability of computer-controlled collimators on some accelerators has led to techniques for dynamic beam modification, mainly to simulate beam wedge filters. This work addresses the practical aspects of dynamic tissue compensation in one dimension using available treatment-planning software. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Data derived from the treatment-planning program is used with an iterative calculational routine to determine the monitor unit settings needed for the collimator-controlling computer. The method was first tested by simulating a 60 degrees physical wedge. Further studies were carried out on a specially fabricated plastic phantom that modeled the sagittal contour of the upper torso, neck, and lower head regions. RESULTS: Dynamic wedge point doses generated by the planning program agreed within 1% with the values directly measured in a polystyrene phantom. In the patient phantom, dynamic collimation achieved calculated dose uniformity within 0.5% in a reference plane near the phantom midline. A comparison of computer-generated and measured point doses in this case showed agreement within 3%. CONCLUSIONS: Dynamic collimation can provide effective compensation for contours that vary primarily along one direction. A conventional treatment-planning program can be used to plan dynamic collimation and deliver a prescribed dose with reliable accuracy.

Models, Anatomic↗

A method for implementing dynamic photon beam intensity modulation using independent jaws and a multileaf collimator.

A mathematical model is derived for digitally controlled linear accelerators to deliver a desired photon intensity distribution by combining collimator motion and machine dose rate variations. It shows that, at any instant, the quotient of the machine dose rate and the speed of collimator motion is proportional to the gradient of the desired in-air photon fluence distribution. The model is applicable for both independently controlled collimator jaws and multileaf collimators and can be implemented by controlling different parameters to accommodate linear accelerators from different manufactures. For independent jaws, each pair of jaws creates photon fluence variations along the direction of the jaw movement. For multileaf collimators, where each leaf is independently controlled, any two-dimensional (2D) photon fluence distribution can be delivered. The model has been implemented for wedged isodose distributions using independent jaws, and 2D intensity modulation using a multileaf collimator. One-dimensional (1D) wedged isodose distributions are created by moving an independent jaw at constant speed while varying machine dose rate. 2D intensity modulation has been implemented using a 'dynamic stepping' scheme, which controls the leaf progression during irradiation at constant machine dose rate. With this automated delivery scheme, the beam delivery time for dynamic intensity modulation, which depends on the complexity of the desired intensity distribution, approaches that of conventional beam modifiers. This paper shows the derivation of the model, its application, and our delivery scheme. Examples of 1D dynamic wedges and 2D intensity modulations will be given to illustrate the versatility of the model, the simplicity of its application, and the efficiency of beam delivery. These features make this approach practical for delivering conformal therapy treatments.

Biophysical Phenomena↗

Kilovision: thermal modeling of a kilovoltage x-ray source integrated into a medical linear accelerator.

The thermal and thermo-mechanical (fatigue) properties of a stationary-anode kilovoltage x-ray source that can be integrated into the head of a medical linear accelerator have been modeled. A finite element program has been used to model two new target designs. The first design makes minor modifications to the existing target assembly of a Varian medical linear accelerator, while the second design adds an additional cooling tube, changes the target angle, and uses a tungsten-rhenium alloy rather than tungsten as the kilovoltage target material. The thermal calculations have been used to generate cyclic stress/strain values from which estimates of fatigue in the target designs have been made. Both kilovoltage and megavoltage operation have been studied. Analysis of the megavoltage operation shows that there are only small differences in the thermal and fatigue characteristics after the target assembly is modified to include a kilovoltage target. Thus, megavoltage operation should not be compromised. The first kilovoltage target design can handle a 900 W heat load (e.g., 120 kVp, 7.5 mA, 2 x 2 mm2 source size); the heat load being limited by the temperature at the surface of the cooling tubes and mechanical fatigue at the surface of the target. The second design can handle a 1250 W heat load (e.g., 120 kVp, approximately 10.4 mA, 2 x 2 mm2 source size). Our calculations show that installation of a kilovoltage x-ray target is practical from thermal and thermo-mechanical perspectives.

Computer Simulation↗

A 4-MV CT scanner for radiation therapy: the prototype system.

A Varian 4-MV isocentric therapy accelerator has been modified to perform also as a CT scanner. The goal is to provide a computed tomography capability for use in radiotherapy at low cost. We envision three principal uses for the system. These are (i) to provide two and three-dimensional maps of electron density distribution for CT assisted therapy planning; (ii) to aid in patient set up by providing sectional views of the treatment volume and high contrast scout-mode verification images; and (iii) to provide a means for periodically checking the patients anatomical conformation against that which was used to generate the original therapy plan. The machine was modified by mounting an array of detectors on a frame that is bolted to the counterweight end of the gantry in such a manner as to define a "third generation" CT scanner geometry. Details of the detectors and data acquisition electronics are provided. We present results of phantom studies which demonstrate that this prototype system has a spatial resolution of 4 mm and the ability to discriminate electron density differences of less than 1%. We also show that the system is exactly linear over a wide range of electron densities corresponding to those found in body tissues.

Particle Accelerators↗

Commissioning and quality assurance for MLC-based IMRT.

The commissioning and quality assurance (QA) associated with the implementation of linear accelerator multileaf collimator (MLC)-based intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) at the University of Nebraska Medical Center are described. Our MLC-based IMRT is implemented using the PRIMUS linear accelerator interface through the IMPAC record and verification system to the CORVUS treatment planning system. The "step-and-shoot" technique is used for this MLC-based IMRT. Commissioning process requires the verification of predefined parameters available on the CORVUS and the collection of some machine data. The machine data required are output factor in air and output factor in phantom, and percent depth dose for a number of field sizes. In addition, inplane and crossplane dose profiles of 4 x 4 cm and 20 x 20 cm field sizes and diagonal dose profiles of a large field size have to be measured. Validation of connectivity and dose model includes the use of uniform intensity bar strips, triangular-shaped nonuniform intensity bar strip, and N-shaped target. QA procedure follows the recommendation of the AAPM Task Group No. 40 report. In addition, the leaf position accuracy and reproducibility of the MLC should be checked at regular intervals. The dose validation is implemented through the hybrid plan where the patient beam parameters are applied to a flat phantom. Independent dose calculation method is used to confirm the dose delivery plan and data input to the CORVUS.

Equipment Design↗

A monte carlo approach to electron contamination sources in the Saturne-25 and -41.

The various components of the accelerator treatment head act as sources of contaminating electrons. The presence of contamination electrons increases the surface dose, which deteriorates the skin-sparing effect. The present study examines the sources of this 'contamination', the influence on the surface dose and the shape of the build-up curve. The Monte Carlo simulation of two linear accelerators, Saturne-25 and -41, allowed us to study the influence of electron contamination in various therapeutic energies and in different geometries. The Saturne-25 and -41 cover a wide range of therapeutic energies with nominal energies 12/23 MV and 6/15 MV, respectively. The analysis of the results shows that at a source-to-surface distance of 100 cm and a wide opening of the collimators, the main sources of contaminating electrons are the flattening filter and the air below it. The contribution of the secondary contamination electrons on the surface dose is 16% for 6 MV and 12 MV, 6% for 15 MV and 17% for 23 MV. The energy spectra of electrons coming from the flattening filter and the air below it are completely different. The air produces electrons of low energies. The mean energies of these spectra vary from 1 MeV to 2 MeV depending on the nominal energy of the photon beam. The secondary electrons generated by the flattening filter produce a wide energy spectrum with mean energies of the same order of the bremsstrahlung spectrum. The flattening filter absorbs the secondary electrons generated in the target, the primary collimator and the air inside the head.

Air↗

Effect of head phantom size on 10B and 1H[n,gamma]2H dose distributions for a broad field accelerator epithermal neutron source for BNCT.

The effect of head phantom size on the 10B and 1H[n,gamma]2H dose distributions for a broad epithermal neutron radiation field generated by an accelerator-based epithermal neutron source for boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) have been studied. Also two techniques for calculating the absorbed gamma dose from a measured gamma-ray source distribution are compared: a Monte Carlo technique, which is well accepted in the BNCT community, and a Point Kernel technique. The count-rate distribution in the central plane of three rectangular parallelopiped head water phantoms irradiated with an epithermal neutron field was measured with a boron trifluoride (BF3) detector. This epithermal neutron field was produced at the Ohio State University Van de Graaff Accelerator Facility. The 10B absorbed dose and the gamma-ray source have the same distribution in the head phantom as the BF3 count-rate distribution. The absorbed gamma dose from the measured source distribution was calculated using MCNP, a Monte Carlo code, and QAD-CGGP, a Point Kernel code. The most pronounced effect of phantom size on 10B absorbed dose was on the dose rate at the depth of maximum dose, dmax. An increase in dose rate at dmax was observed with a decrease in phantom size, the dose rate in the smallest phantom being larger by a factor of 1.4 than the dose rate in the largest phantom. Also, dmax for the phantoms shifted deeper with a decrease in phantom dimensions. The shift between the largest and the smallest phantoms was 6 mm. Finally, the smaller phantoms had lower entrance 10B dose as a percent of the dose at dmax, or better skin sparing. Our calculations for the gamma dose show that a Point Kernel technique can be used to calculate the dose distribution as accurately as a Monte Carlo technique, in much shorter computation times.

Boron Neutron Capture Therapy↗

Radiosurgery for the treatment of brain metastases in renal cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: In the treatment of brain metastases using a stereotactically modified linear accelerator it could be shown that a single dose between 15 and 25 Gy leads to partial or complete remission of so-called radioresistant metastases from melanoma and hypernephroma. Radiosurgery of brain metastases then started in centers all over the world, however, experiences with brain metastases of renal cell carcinoma are yet limited. The aim of this analysis is therefore to present the treatment results of radiosurgery of brain metastases. Furthermore, in this paper prognostic subgroups shall be defined, in order to establish guidelines for an optimal therapy strategy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Radiosurgery means stereotactically guided high-precision irradiation methods by extremely focussing ionizing radiation within the target volume as a single dose application. The characteristic steep dose decrease allows the selective destruction of small intracranial lesions, while the surrounding brain tissue is optimally protected. Two methods, Gamma Knife and stereotactic modified linear accelerator are clinically available. RESULTS: In larger studies from different groups all over the world, local tumor control rates from 85% to 95%, recurrence rates from 6% to 15% and side effects between 3% and 15% have been attained, independent of the system used. Prognostic factors, like volume of metastases < 10 ml, applied dose > 18 Gy, one or two metastases, absence of extracranial metastases, good patient performance with a Karnofsky score > 70%, primary treatment and more than one year between primary diagnosis and brain metastases showed a trend toward improved survival. Depending on the prognostic factors the median survival after radiosurgery ranged from 6 to 12 months. Retrospective comparison of radiosurgery and surgical series suggest that both modalities attain similar results. The dose can be applied with an accuracy of 0.3 mm. DISCUSSION: Based on these experiences, brain metastases can be treated by radiosurgery, primarily in patients with one or two metastases or in combination with whole brain irradiation as a boost in patients with more than two metastases. Furthermore with radiosurgery a new treatment modality exists to re-irradiate patients who have been failed after surgery or whole brain irradiation.

Bone Neoplasms↗

Spectral reconstruction by scatter analysis for a linear accelerator photon beam.

Pre-existing methods for photon beam spectral reconstruction are briefly reviewed. An alternative reconstruction method by scatter analysis for linear accelerators is introduced. The method consists in irradiating a small plastic phantom at standard 100 cm SSD and inferring primary beam energy spectral information based on the measurement with a standard Farmer chamber of scatter around the phantom at several specific scatter angles: a scatter curve is measured which is indicative of the primary spectrum at hand. A Monte Carlo code is used to simulate the scatter measurement set-up and predict the relative magnitude of scatter measurements for mono-energetic primary beams. Based on mono-energetic primary scatter data, measured scatter curves are analysed and the spectrum unfolded as the sum of mono-energetic individual energy bins using the Schiff bremsstrahlung model. The method is applied to an Elekta/SL18 6 MV photon beam. The reconstructed spectrum matches the Monte Carlo calculated spectrum for the same beam within 6.2% (average error when spectra are compared bin by bin). Depth dose values calculated for the reconstructed spectrum agree with physically measured depth dose data to within 1%. Scatter analysis is preliminarily shown to have potential as a practical spectral reconstruction method requiring few measurements under standard 100 cm SSD and feasible in any radiotherapy department using a phantom and a Farmer chamber.

Computer Simulation↗

Precise positioning of intracranial small tumors to the linear accelerator's isocenter, using a stereotactic radiotherapy computed tomography system (SRT-CT).

RT-CT was developed as a simulator using CT scan for radiotherapy. Following three-dimensional treatment planning using CT images, the treatment center and treatment fields are projected to the patients' surface by laser beam on the C arm. The prototype had an accuracy of 3 mm which was equivalent to conventional X-ray simulators but was not adequate for use in stereotactic radiotherapy. A new RT-CT system was developed to have a precise localization capability for stereotactic radiotherapy. Using this stereotactic RT-CT (SRT-CT) after three-dimensional planning, the treatment center is projected to the stereotactic frame automatically. In this study, the values of the x, y and z coordinates of the target center determined by SRT-CT are compared with those determined by the traditional method using CT localizing plates. The discrepancies were within 1.0 mm in 90% and 1.5 mm in 100% of 30 measurements in 16 patients. The disadvantages of SRT-CT may be that the accuracy of localization depends on the quality of calibration of laser beams. The traditional CT localizing method has superiority over SRT-CT because of its solid coordinates but its accuracy is vulnerable to alignment of CT fiducial marker plates. Therefore, the SRT-CT and traditional CT localizing methods would be complementary to each other for precise localization.

Brain Neoplasms↗

Dose measurements in the build-up region for the photon beams from Clinac-1800 dual energy medical linear accelerator.

AIM: Since the skin dose becomes the limiting factor while deciding the tumorcidal dose, the detailed analysis of dose distribution in the build-up region is necessary for high-energy photon beams. In this study the beam characteristics affecting the build-up and skin dose for 6- and 18-MV photons are analyzed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Measurements were made with 6- and 18-MV photons using a PTW parallel-plate ionization chamber (B 23344-036) and a RDM-1F electrometer. Build-up ionization measurements were made with the chamber fitted into a 25 x 25 x 25 cm polystyrene phantom with a fixed SSD of 100 cm. The entrance and build-up dose measurements were made with a polycarbonate and a mesh type metallic shielding tray and a 45 degrees wedge. Exit dose measurements were carried out for the graphite patient supporting assembly table top, 1.0 cm thick piece of wood and the 1.0 cm thick patient supporting perspex base frame for head and neck treatments. RESULTS: It was observed that the dmax decreased slightly with field size as with other accelerators. For both photon energies the surface dose was observed to increase with increase in field size. It was also noticed that the dose in the build-up region increases slightly when the polycarbonate secondary blocking tray is introduced with the increase in surface dose. The data show that the tray perturbation factor (TPF) at surface decreases steadily with tray-surface distance for both photon beams for all field sizes. It was noted that the TPF was more when the polycarbonate tray was introduced at shorter tray-surface distances for both energies. At tray-surface distances above 60 cm the TPF almost remained close to unity for 6-MV photons for all field sizes, whereas the continuous decrease in TPF could be noted for 18-MV photon beams even after the TPF reached unity. CONCLUSION: The increase in surface dose with field size for both photon energies is due to the electron scattering from the intervening materials. The use of wedge filters absorbs low-energy scattered electrons significantly and hence, the relative surface dose (RSD) is always less than unity. The increase in dose enhancement percentage with graphite compared to perspex supporting assembly indicates that the electron backscatter is proportional to the atomic number of the medium.

Electrons↗

The utility of the Philips SRI-100 Real Time Portal Imaging Device in a case of postoperative irradiation for prevention of heterotopic bone formation following total hip replacement.

The new Radiation Oncology Department at the Heidelberg Repatriation Hospital in Melbourne, Australia commenced operation in June 1992. As part of quality control the Philips SL-15 linear accelerator was fitted with the Philips SRI-100 Real Time Portal Imaging Device (RTPID), the first such apparatus in Australia. One of its major advantages over older systems is its ability to provide a permanent hard copy of the image of the field treated. The computer image can be immediately manipulated and enhanced on the screen (with respect to such qualities as brightness and contrast) prior to the printing of the hard copy. This is a significant improvement over the more cumbersome older port films that required developing time, without any pre-assessment of the image quality. The utility of the Philips SRI-100 RTPID is demonstrated in the case of a patient irradiated soon after total hip replacement, as prophylaxis against heterotopic bone formation (HBF). The rapidity and quality of image production is a major advantage in these patients where post-operative pain may result in positional change between film exposure and image production. Extremely accurate shielding block position is essential to shield the prosthesis (and allow bone ingrowth for fixation) whilst avoiding inadvertent shielding of the areas at risk for HBF. A review of the literature is provided.

Adult↗

Peripheral dose outside applicators in electron beams.

The peripheral dose outside the applicators in electron beams was studied using a Varian 21 EX linear accelerator. To measure the peripheral dose profiles and point doses for the applicator, a solid water phantom was used with calibrated Kodak TL films. Peak dose spot was observed in the 4 MeV beam outside the applicator. The peripheral dose peak was very small in the 6 MeV beam and was ignorable at higher energies. Using the 10 x 10 cm(2) cutout and applicator, the dose peak for the 4 MeV beam was about 12 cm away from the field central beam axis (CAX) and the peripheral dose profiles did not change with depths measured at 0.2, 0.5 and 1 cm. The peripheral doses and profiles were further measured by varying the angle of obliquity, cutout and applicator size for the 4 MeV beam. The local peak dose was increased with about 3% per degree angle of obliquity, and was about 1% of the prescribed dose (angle of obliquity equals zero) at 1 cm depth in the phantom using the 10 x 10 cm(2) cutout and applicator. The peak dose position was also shifted 7 mm towards the CAX when the angle of obliquity was increased from 0 to 15 degrees.

Body Burden↗

Dosimetry limitations and a dose correction methodology for step-and-shoot IMRT.

For the step-and-shoot intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) technique, the combination of high dose rate, multiple beam segments and low dose per segment can lead to significant differences between the planned dose and the dose delivered to the patient. In this technique, a dose delivery inaccuracy known as the 'overshoot' effect is caused by the dose servo control system. This typically occurs in the first and last beam segments and causes an over- and underdose, respectively. Some dose positional error in the segment sequence is also possible there. Commercial ionization chambers (RK-type) and radiographic Kodak films were used for the measurements. The reported results were obtained using the Pinnacle(3)-V6.2 treatment planning system and a Varian Clinac 21 EX linear accelerator equipped with a 120-leaf Millennium MLC. The dose inaccuracy measurements were based on the comparison of the dose and profiles for reference fields and fields irradiated with the step-and-shoot technique. For our linear accelerators, an 'overshoot' effect ranging from 0.1 to 0.6 MU was found, corresponding to a dose rate from 100 to 600 MU min(-1), respectively. For segments with off-axis distances from 0 to 5.5 cm with >3.5 MU per segment and all dose rates, a MLC leaf-position error of <1 mm was measured. For segments with an off-axis distance of 9.5 cm, a positional error >2 mm was measured for 600 MU min(-1) and 1 MU per segment. The purpose of this study was to find a correction method for segmental dose errors caused by the 'overshoot' effect when small monitor unit and high dose rate are used. To better represent the fluctuation of the segment doses in the beam, a dose ratio between reference and step-and-shoot irradiated fields was defined. A method for the correction of segment dose inaccuracies and a quality assurance programme for the 'overshoot' effect were developed. The ordering of the biggest segment shape in the segment sequence was studied for ten randomly selected prostate patients planned for IMRT. The results of this work can be used to improve the agreement between the planned and delivered doses for IMRT.

Film Dosimetry↗

Guidance document on delivery, treatment planning, and clinical implementation of IMRT: report of the IMRT Subcommittee of the AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee.

Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) represents one of the most significant technical advances in radiation therapy since the advent of the medical linear accelerator. It allows the clinical implementation of highly conformal nonconvex dose distributions. This complex but promising treatment modality is rapidly proliferating in both academic and community practice settings. However, these advances do not come without a risk. IMRT is not just an add-on to the current radiation therapy process; it represents a new paradigm that requires the knowledge of multimodality imaging, setup uncertainties and internal organ motion, tumor control probabilities, normal tissue complication probabilities, three-dimensional (3-D) dose calculation and optimization, and dynamic beam delivery of nonuniform beam intensities. Therefore, the purpose of this report is to guide and assist the clinical medical physicist in developing and implementing a viable and safe IMRT program. The scope of the IMRT program is quite broad, encompassing multileaf-collimator-based IMRT delivery systems, goal-based inverse treatment planning, and clinical implementation of IMRT with patient-specific quality assurance. This report, while not prescribing specific procedures, provides the framework and guidance to allow clinical radiation oncology physicists to make judicious decisions in implementing a safe and efficient IMRT program in their clinics.

Algorithms↗