PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10326852

Self-guided robotic camera control for laparoscopic surgery compared with human camera control.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In laparoscopic surgery, the surgeon no longer has direct visual control of the operation area, and a camera assistant who maneuvers the laparoscope is essential. Problems of cooperation between the two naturally arise, and a robotic assistant that automatically controls the laparoscope can offer a highly desirable alternative to this situation. METHODS: A self-guided robotic camera control system (SGRCCS) based upon a color tracking method has been developed and its use evaluated in 20 cases of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and compared with using human camera control. RESULTS: In 83% of the patients the procedures were successfully completed with the SGRCCS. Set-up time for the robot averaged 21 minutes; and the surgical time with and without the robot averaged 54 and 60 minutes, respectively. Using the robot instead of a human camera assistant significantly reduced both the frequency of the camera correction, 2.2 per hour compared with 15.3 per hour, and frequency of the lens cleaning, 1.0 per hour compared with 6.8 per hour. Subjective assessment by the surgeon revealed that the robot performed better than the human assistant in 71 % of the cases. CONCLUSIONS: In laparoscopic surgery, the SGRCCS offered optimal camera guidance and helped to maintain the surgeon's concentration during the operation.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

K Omote, H Feussner, A Ungeheuer, K Arbter, G Q Wei, J R Siewert, G Hirzinger. 1999. Self-guided robotic camera control for laparoscopic surgery compared with human camera control.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9610(99)00055-0

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Timing of adoption of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Denmark and in The Netherlands: a comparative study.

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has diffused rapidly in most industrialised countries. The aim of this study has been to analyse the impact of different hospital characteristics on the hospital adoption of LC in Denmark and The Netherlands. Data on the timing of the adoption of LC and hospital characteristics (hospital size, teaching status and location) were retrieved in both countries. Proportional hazard regression was used to analyse different multivariate models. A total of 59 Danish and 109 Dutch hospitals adopting LC were identified. The multivariate analyses showed that increased hospital size was associated with relatively early adoption of LC in Denmark. Neither this nor other hospital characteristics influenced the timing of adoption in The Netherlands. As in other countries studied, hospital size is identified as an important factor in hospital adoption, whereas teaching status and location play a more limited role. The study shows that a multivariate method, such as the proportional hazard regression, can be used to elucidate differences among countries of the impact of different factors on the adoption of medium-ticket technologies like LC. Such multinational comparisons provide valuable information for health policy and planning.

Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic↗

Randomized trial of needlescopic versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

BACKGROUND: Several studies have reported the feasibility of using 'needlescopic' instruments with a diameter less than 3 mm in minimally invasive surgery. This study reports a comparison of needlescopic cholecystectomy and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. METHODS: Seventy-five patients with symptomatic chronic cholelithiasis were randomized to needlescopic (n = 37) or laparoscopic (n = 38) cholecystectomy. RESULTS: The duration of surgery in the two groups was similar. Patients in the needlescopic group had less pain (mean visual analogue score 2.2 versus 3.6; P < 0.003) and had smaller scars (median length 17.0 versus 25.0 mm; P < 0.001). In addition, patients in the needlescopic group tended to require fewer intramuscular pethidine injections (P = 0.05). However, oral analgesic requirements in the two groups were similar. There were no complications in either group. CONCLUSION: Needlescopic cholecystectomy resulted in less postoperative pain and a smaller surgical scar than laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with chronic cholecystitis.

Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic↗