PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 11651987

A plea for the heart.

Martyn Evans
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Martyn Evans believes that it is a 'shocking feature' of brain-centred conceptions of death that they require us to regard as dead a person whose heart may continue to beat spontaneously. When it comes to neocortical conceptions of death, we might even be burying or cremating a 'breathing corpse'. If proponents of neocortical definitions of death suggest active interventions to stop the remaining spontaneous functions, in what sense, asks Evans, is this different from killing? Also, does it make sense to accept, as many proponents of brain-centred conceptions of death do, that it is proper to 'explant' organs from 'beating-heart cadavers', whilst squirming at the thought of cremating a 'breathing corpse'?

Explore related subjects

Attitude to DeathBrain DeathDeathDehumanizationHeartHomicideHumansIndividualityMoralsPersistent Vegetative StatePersonhoodPhilosophyTissue DonorsTissue and Organ ProcurementAnalytical ApproachDeath and EuthanasiaPhilosophical ApproachJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Martyn Evans. 1990. A plea for the heart.. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8519.1990.tb00085.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Existence and pluralism: the rediscovery of Karl Jaspers.

Karl Jaspers has been recognized in psychiatry mostly for his influence on phenomenology and on certain aspects of psychopathology, such as our understanding of delusions. In this paper, I will highlight the need to rediscover Jaspers' work in terms of other important ideas that he can contribute to psychiatry, in particular the concepts of limit situations, transcendence and pluralism. Limit situations refer to the fact that human life is characterized by existential situations, or crises, which become opportunities for authentic existence. Transcendence refers to the notion that freedom is an important aspect of human existence and cannot be explained by purely scientific understanding or encompassed by any purely rationalistic system of thought. Pluralism is perhaps Jaspers' most original perspective, which has still failed to be adequately appreciated by the psychiatric profession. The idea here is that science means understanding the methods by which we obtain knowledge, along with the presuppositions and limits of those methods. Contemporary psychiatry has only a limited appreciation of Jaspers' work. In this paper, I attempt to describe these important concepts that can help us understand what we do in psychiatry, what we should be doing and why.

Attitude to Death↗