PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 16237565

Supranormal renal function in unilateral hydronephrosis: does it represent true hyperfunction?

Abstract

The existence of supranormal differential renal function in unilateral hydronephrosis remains controversial. While some authors consider it as fact, others believe that it is just a technical artifact. Within our department, chromium-51 ethylene diamine tetra-acetic acid (Cr-EDTA) renal clearance is systematically performed in conjunction with technetium-99m mercaptoacetyltriglycine (MAG3) renograms to derive an absolute single kidney glomerular filtration rate (SKGFR). Our data allows us to ascertain whether supranormal differential renal function in unilateral hydronephrosis might be due to hypofunction of the contralateral kidney. Children with marked unilateral hydronephrosis were selected from a large database of MAG3 diuretic(s) renograms. We excluded patients with posterior urethral valves, duplex anomalies, neurogenic bladder, solitary kidney, and those who underwent any previous urological surgery. We also excluded children who had an early furosemide injection (F0 procedure), selecting only those having received furosemide at the end of the renogram (F+20 test). Seventy-three patients (92 renograms) fulfilled these criteria. Differential renal function was calculated using the integral method. Hydronephrotic kidney with a relative uptake > or =55% was defined as supranormal. Six renograms (four patients) demonstrated supranormal relative function on the hydronephrotic side. However, the SKGFR of these kidneys was in all cases within the range of normal values, while the contralateral side demonstrated borderline low SKGFR. Increased relative function on the side of the hydronephrotic kidney is relatively infrequent. When it occurs, it may be related to a borderline hypofunction of the contralateral kidney.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Annelies Maenhout, Hamphrey Ham, K Ismaili, M Hall, R A Dierckx, A Piepsz. 2005-10-20. Supranormal renal function in unilateral hydronephrosis: does it represent true hyperfunction?. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-005-2049-8

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

A washing procedure to mobilize mixed contaminants from soil: I. Polychlorinated biphenyl compounds.

We conducted a laboratory study to assess the feasibility of a washing process with nonionic and anionic surfactants in combination with ethylenediaminetetraacetate (EDTA) for the simultaneous mobilization of heavy metals and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) from a field-contaminated soil. Unit processes consisting of complexometric extraction and surfactant-assisted mobilization were combined with reagent regeneration and detoxification steps to generate innocuous products. Ten minutes of ultrasonic mixing of the soil with a combination of 30 mL L(-1) surfactant suspension and a sparing quantity (2 mmol) of EDTA mobilized appreciable quantities of PCBs, virtually all of the available Cd, Cu, Mn, and Pb, and lesser amounts of the Zn, Ni, and Cr but only small quantities of Al and Fe. Relative to individual reagents, combinations of surfactant (Brij 98, Triton X-301, or Triton XQS-20) with EDTA did not influence PCB extraction efficiencies perceptibly. Of the three surfactants, the Brij 98 proved to be the most efficient for three successive extractions with a single charge, mobilizing 83% of the PCBs, whereas companion extractions that used fresh reagent each time mobilized 87% of the soil PCB content. The decreased PCB mobilization with the same quantity of anionic surfactant (71 or 68%) resulted from losses during the EDTA regeneration process with zero-valent Mg. In toto, these studies demonstrate that PCB compounds and selected heavy metals can be coextracted efficiently from soil with three successive washes with the same washing suspension containing EDTA and a nonionic surfactant.

Chelating Agents↗

Pyridine- and phosphonate-containing ligands for stable Ln complexation. Extremely fast water exchange on the Gd(III) chelates.

Two novel ligands containing pyridine units and phosphonate pendant arms, with ethane-1,2-diamine (L2) or cyclohexane-1,2-diamine (L3) backbones, have been synthesized for Ln complexation. The hydration numbers obtained from luminescence lifetime measurements in aqueous solutions of the Eu(III) and Tb(III) complexes are q = 0.6 (EuL2), 0.7 (TbL2), 0.8 (EuL3), and 0.4 (TbL3). To further assess the hydration equilibrium, we have performed a variable-temperature and -pressure UV-vis spectrophotometric study on the Eu(III) complexes. The reaction enthalpy, entropy, and volume for the hydration equilibrium EuL <--> EuL(H2O) were calculated to be DeltaH degrees = -(11.6 +/- 2) kJ mol(-1), DeltaS degrees = -(34.2 +/- 5) J mol(-1) K(-1), and = 1.8 +/- 0.3 for EuL2 and DeltaH degrees = -(13.5 +/- 1) kJ mol(-1), DeltaS degrees = -(41 +/- 4) J mol(-1) K(-1), and = 1.7 +/- 0.3 for EuL3, respectively. We have carried out variable-temperature 17O NMR and nuclear magnetic relaxation dispersion (NMRD) measurements on the GdL2(H2O)q and GdL3(H2O)q systems. Given the presence of phosphonate groups in the ligand backbone, a second-sphere relaxation mechanism has been included for the analysis of the longitudinal (17)O and (1)H NMR relaxation rates. The water exchange rate on GdL2(H2O)q, = (7.0 +/- 0.8) x 10(8) s(-1), is extremely high and comparable to that on the Gd(III) aqua ion, while it is slightly reduced for GdL3(H2O)q, = (1.5 +/- 0.1) x 10(8) s(-1). This fast exchange can be rationalized in terms of a very flexible inner coordination sphere, which is slightly rigidified for L3 by the introduction of the cyclohexyl group on the amine backbone. The water exchange proceeds via a dissociative interchange mechanism, evidenced by the positive activation volumes obtained from variable-pressure 17O NMR for both GdL2(H2O)q and GdL3(H2O)q (DeltaV = +8.3 +/- 1.0 and 8.7 +/- 1.0 cm(3) mol(-1), respectively).

Chelating Agents↗

Current methods for phosphoprotein isolation and enrichment.

The phosphorylation of proteins is a central paradigm of signal transduction. The substitution of neutral hydroxyl groups of serine, threonine and tyrosine with a negatively charged phosphate group alters the physicochemical and immunogenic properties of the protein, which then can be used to isolate these isoforms. In the last decades several different techniques were applied, attempting to selectively enrich protein populations with this post-translational modification. This review aims to give an overview on the arsenal of available methods to extract phosphoproteins focusing on chromatographic approaches.

Chelating Agents↗