PubMed · 16608096
[Evaluating training programs on occupational health and safety: questionnaire development].
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To develop a questionnaire to evaluate the quality of training programs on occupational health and safety. METHODS: A questionnaire comprising five subscales and 21 items was developed. The reliability and validity of the questionnaire was tested. Final validation of the questionnaire was undertaken in 700 workers in an oil refining company. RESULTS: The Cronbach's alpha coefficients of the five subscales ranged from 0.6194 to 0.6611. The subscale-scale Pearson correlation coefficients ranged from 0.568 to 0.834 . The theta coefficients of the five subscales were greater than 0.7. The factor loadings of the five subscales in the principal component analysis ranged from 0.731 to 0.855. Use of the questionnaire in the 700 workers produced a good discriminability, with excellent, good, fair and poor comprising 22.2%, 31.2%, 32.4% and 14.1 respectively. Given the fact that 18.7% of workers had never been trained and 29.7% of workers got one-off training only, the training program scored an average of 57.2. CONCLUSION: The questionnaire is suitable to be used in evaluating the quality of training programs on occupational health and safety. The oil refining company needs to improve training for their workers on occupational health and safety.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Xiao-Yan Zhou, Zhi-Ming Wang, Mian-Zhen Wang. 2006. [Evaluating training programs on occupational health and safety: questionnaire development].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16608096/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.