PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 2912622

Tibialis posterior tendon dysfunction.

Abstract

Dysfunction of the tibialis posterior tendon evolves through a series of stages. The pain symptoms, clinical signs, and roentgenographic changes for each of these stages are characteristic. This staging system permits clarification and individualization of dysfunction, expected pathologic changes, and surgical treatment. The importance of the tibialis posterior tendon in normal hindfoot function and its treatment when injured are now being properly appreciated.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

K A Johnson, D E Strom. 1989. Tibialis posterior tendon dysfunction.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2912622/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Gait analysis--a prerequisite for general movement analysis].

Our system for analysis of gait is a combined visualisation of angular velocities in any joint with dynamic measurements of pressure at the sole while walking in a natural surrounding. Infrared reflectors are attached to chosen parts of the body. Their position in space is sampled over time and transferred to an easily manageable personal computer that visualizes motion in progression as angular velocities. Pressure at the sole is measured by pressure sensors. The magnitude of force is expressed as calibrated circular areas following the dynamic course of gait. The system is accurate and easily operated. The time necessary for measurements and evaluation of data as well as the costs render an application in daily clinical work acceptable.

Foot

Interaction of vestibular and proprioceptive inputs for human self-motion perception.

Human perception of horizontal self(body)-motion in space was studied during various combinations of vestibular and leg-proprioceptive stimuli in the dark. During sinusoidal rotations of the trunk relative to the stationary feet (functionally synergistic combination) the perception was almost veridical over the frequency range tested (0.025-0.4 Hz). This finding suggested a dominance of the proprioceptive over the vestibular input, since the quantitative aspects of the perception (gain, phase, and detection threshold): (a) closely resembled those of the proprioceptive foot-to-trunk perception, and (b) clearly differed from those of the vestibular self-motion perception. However, when using other combinations, the self-motion perception changed in a monotonous way as a function of the two inputs, indicating that the two inputs do interact in a linear way. In a model of these findings the interaction occurs in two stages: (1) summation of a vestibular trunk-in-space signal and a (dynamically matched) proprioceptive foot-to-trunk signal yields an internal representation of foot support motion in space; (2) superposition of the latter by an almost ideal proprioceptive trunk-to-foot signal results in a representation of trunk-in-space motion (essentially proprioception-dependent and ideal when the feet are stationary).

Foot