PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 3329204

[The Octopus G1 program. Description and use].

Abstract

The Octopus global analysis Program G1 was developed as a glaucoma program. It is the combination in a single program of: examination procedures, visual field assessment methods. The whole examination is carried out in three phases: the first phase measures 59 test locations in the central 30 degrees field. All locations are measured with the normal strategy. The local threshold is precisely determined to +/- 1 dB by the proven bracketing method. At the end of the first phase, the system automatically calculates the key values (visual field indices) for mean defect and loss variance. the second phase, which retests the same central field, starts from the threshold values measured during phase one. The additional indices corrected loss variance and short term fluctuation, are calculated. in the last phase 14 selected peripheral points between 30 and 60 degrees excentricity with particular emphasis on the superior and inferior nasal step are determined in a qualitative test. Visual field changes can be detected and categorized in three major groups: (Flammer and coll., 1985). 1. local defects or scotomas in varying depths and sizes. 2. diffused depression of the whole field. 3. Increased short-term. The original index called Corrected Loss Variance could determine an early defect before the existence of a light scotoma. Particularly, an increased Corrected Loss Variance indicates that the deviations are due to real scotomas and not just to scattering effects. The therapeutic decision could be more rational.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

F Pradines, B Delbosc, M Montard, J Royer. 1987. [The Octopus G1 program. Description and use].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3329204/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Improvement of automated electrocardiographic diagnosis by combination of computer interpretations of the electrocardiogram and vectorcardiogram.

In the international project "Common Standards for Quantitative Electrocardiography" (CSE), diagnostic results of different computer programs for the interpretation of the electrocardiogram (ECG) and of the vectorcardiogram (VCG) were combined, and it was shown that the "combined program" performs better than each program separately. Because the program MEANS (Modular ECG Analysis System) comprises 2 different classification programs--one for the ECG, the other for the VCG--this allowed investigation of whether the combined interpretations would yield a better diagnostic result than either one separately. This approach requires that a VCG always be recorded in addition to the ECG. To circumvent this complication, the VCG was reconstructed from the simultaneously recorded ECG leads. This reconstructed VCG was then interpreted by the VCG classification program, whereupon the diagnostic interpretations of the ECG and the reconstructed VCG were combined. For the validation, the CSE database of documented ECGs and VCGs (n = 1,220) was used. The combination of the ECG and VCG interpretations yielded a better diagnostic result than each interpretation program separately (total accuracy 74.2% (ECG + VCG) vs 69.8% (ECG) and 70.2% (VCG), p less than 0.001 in both cases). The results for the reconstructed VCG (total accuracy 70.5%) are comparable to those for the ECG and the VCG (p greater than 0.10 in both cases). The performance of the combined interpretations of ECG and reconstructed VCG (total accuracy 73.6%) is approximately the same as that of the combined ECG and VCG (p greater than 0.10). Thus, the performance of an ECG computer program can be improved by incorporating both ECG and VCG classificatory knowledge, using only the ECG itself.

Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted

[Potential usefulness of computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) in a mass survey for lung cancer using photo-fluorographic films].

We investigated the potential usefulness of computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) in a mass survey for lung cancer. When the sensitivity of the computer output was adjusted nearly equal to that of the mass survey in our database which contained 198 photofluorographic films, some shadows detected by the computer output were different from those detected by human observers. Therefore, the best estimated sensitivity of an observer using the computer output was equal to or greater than the sensitivity of double reading. It is expected that CAD may have a role in a mass survey for lung cancer using photofluorographic films.

Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted