PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 3892578

Routine fetal genitourinary tract screening.

P H Arger·B G Coleman·M C Mintz·H P Snyder·T Camardese·R L Arenson·S G Gabbe·L Aquino
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

To evaluate routine fetal genitourinary tract obstetrical ultrasound screening, and to determine what size renal pelvis is indicative of significant renal disease, we reviewed 4,832 examinations, which had been performed over 2 years, of 3,530 consecutive obstetrical patients. Any fetus that had a renal pelvis greater than 5 mm or a definable cystic area was identified for follow-up. The fetuses of 39 patients (1.1%) who underwent 112 examinations fulfilled these criteria and constitute the basis of this report. A variety of examination criteria were recorded and analyzed in relationship to the follow-up, which ranged from 2-3 days to 21 months. The fetuses of the 39 patients were grouped into three categories: those with renal pelves between 5 and 9 mm in size; those with renal pelves larger than 10 mm; and those with cystic abnormalities. Those with renal pelves larger than 10 mm had either an obstructing lesion or exceptional extrarenal pelves. The clinical and pathologic aspects of these three groups are detailed, discussed, and analyzed. Criteria for significant fetal renal hydronephrosis and aspects of a loculated appearance are given.

Explore related subjects

Dilatation, PathologicFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGestational AgeHumansHydronephrosisInfantInfant, NewbornKidney DiseasesKidney PelvisPolycystic Kidney DiseasesPregnancyPrenatal DiagnosisUltrasonographyUreterUreteral ObstructionUrinary BladderUrinary Bladder DiseasesJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

P H Arger, B G Coleman, M C Mintz, H P Snyder, T Camardese, R L Arenson, S G Gabbe, L Aquino. 1985. Routine fetal genitourinary tract screening.. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.156.2.3892578

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2006

Microscopic esophageal mucosal injury in nonerosive reflux disease.

This review evaluates the current knowledge about the recognition of histologic esophageal mucosal changes in patients with nonerosive gastroesophageal reflux disease and analyzes the technical factors relevant to their interpretation. Studies investigating histologic changes in individuals with nonerosive reflux disease were identified by systematic Medline/PubMed searches from January 1966 to October 2005. Dilation of intercellular spaces was the most consistently reported histologic change in the esophageal mucosa of patients with nonerosive reflux disease, being observed in 41%-100% of patients and 0%-30% of controls. The mean intercellular space width was at least 2 times greater in patients than in controls, irrespective of esophageal acid exposure. Basal cell hyperplasia was observed in 9%-90% of patients compared with 10%-55% of controls. Papillary elongation was observed in 0%-85% of patients and 5%-20% of controls. Both of these features were more prevalent in reflux disease patients with abnormal esophageal acid exposure. All histologic changes responded to acid-suppressive therapy. Inflammatory cell infiltration was seldom observed or had a similar prevalence in patients and controls. Disparities in reported frequencies of change among studies were most likely caused by methodologic factors, most importantly the use of different methods for identifying patients and controls, for histologic sampling, and for biopsy scoring. The reviewed studies suggest that at least two thirds of patients with nonerosive reflux disease have histologic evidence of esophageal injury. Additional work is needed to assess the potential of these histologic changes for the diagnosis and assessment of reflux disease.

Dilatation, Pathologic↗
PubMed2006

Influence of the initial rectal distension on posterior margins in primary and postoperative radiotherapy for prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to define the effect of different rectum fillings in the planning CT study on the posterior clinical target volume (CTV) displacements (PD) in primary and postoperative radiotherapy (RT) for prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty patients underwent CT scans in supine position with a full bladder and an empty bladder before RT and at several points in time during the treatment. PD were determined depending on the initial rectum volume (RV), average cross-sectional rectal area (CSA), and the rectal diameter at the level of the bladder neck (RD). RESULTS: Posterior CTV motion was not found to be minimal with a particularly small initial rectum filling. Steeply increasing PD resulted for patients with RV>120cm(3), CSA>12cm(2), and RD>4.5cm. While below these critical values a posterior margin of 6mm/9mm allowed to cover 80%/90% of displacements, 18mm/24mm were needed for patients with larger rectum fillings. No correlation of increasing rectum distension with increasing PD was found at the apex level. PD could not be reduced by voiding the bladder. CONCLUSIONS: Defining the posterior margin in prostate RT, the initial rectum distension and the superior-inferior CTV level has to be considered. Patients with large initial rectum fillings have preferentially the need for repeated planning CT scans or image-guided RT.

Dilatation, Pathologic↗