PubMed · 8838552
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
J D Bennett. 1995. Care with electrodes.. https://doi.org/10.3109/03005369509076745
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Evaluation and management of tinnitus presents a significant challenge to the internist and the otolaryngologist. Tinnitus may be divided into two basic categories: subjective and objective. The importance of a thorough history and physical examination is emphasized in this article. The steps in a complete evaluation and the rationale for referral to an otolaryngologist are outlined. Multidisciplinary care of the tinnitus patient is best coordinated by the otolaryngologist.
The cause of hearing loss in children is often difficult to identify. We evaluated a cohort of 114 children (47 boys, 67 girls) referred with newly diagnosed hearing loss (non-otitis media) to identify factors predictive of etiology and type of hearing loss. Clinical (history and physical examination), laboratory, and radiographic data were collected. One hundred children (87.7%) had sensorineural hearing loss, and 14 (12.3%) had conductive or mixed hearing loss. The cause of hearing loss was identified in 54 children (48%). Patients with isolated aural atresia (n = 7) or with a known diagnosis of congenital cytomegalovirus infection (n = 21) were excluded from further data analysis. We conducted statistical analysis to identify factors predictive of the cause and type of hearing loss. Clinical factors that aided in identifying a cause included abnormal physical examination findings (p = 0.001) and craniofacial anomalies (p = 0.006). Computed tomography of the temporal bones was the only diagnostic test predictive of cause (p < 0.001). Factors predictive of the type of hearing loss detected (sensorineural vs. conductive or mixed) were abnormal physical examination findings (p = 0.01) and craniofacial anomalies (p = 0.004). An exhaustive laboratory or radiographic workup did not prove beneficial in identifying the etiology of hearing loss in our series.
Stapes surgery for correction of conductive hearing loss in adults with otosclerosis is a well-established procedure. Its effectiveness in children, however, has received less scrutiny in the literature. Previous studies from our and other institutions demonstrated similar results in children and adults. Between 1980 and 1994 stapedectomies were done on 95 ears of 81 patients younger than 18 years (83 primary and 12 revisions). Data regarding age of onset, family history, associated anomalies, surgical findings, technique, hearing results, and complications were reviewed. Two groups were identified: congenital stapedial fixation and juvenile otosclerosis. Patients with congenital stapedial fixation had an earlier onset of hearing loss (3 vs 10 years, P < 0.001), a greater incidence of abnormalities of the malleus and incus (25% vs 3%, P < 0.001), and a slightly greater preoperative air-bone gap (35.2 +/- 12.9 vs 27.8 +/- 8.9, P = 0.002). Patients with otosclerosis had a greater frequency of a positive family history of deafness (53% vs 10%, P < 0.001). Overall, 79% of primary cases and 89% of revision cases had an improvement in hearing, with mean postoperative air-bone gaps of 15 dB and 22 dB, respectively. The gap did not widen significantly during the entire length of follow-up (mean 72 months). In primary cases, 59.1% obtained a postoperative air-bone gap of 10 dB or less. Eighty-two percent of children operated on for otosclerosis obtained excellent results (postoperative air-bone gap < or = 10 dB), compared with only 44% of children with congenital stapedial ankylosis (P = 0.02). In revision surgery, 29% of children obtained excellent results. Poorer results in both cases of congenital stapedial fixation and revision stapedectomy appear to be related to the greater incidence of associated anomalies of the malleus and incus. Indications, technique, complications, and considerations pertinent to childhood stapedectomy are discussed.